IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

250,000 tons of water, released by Deep Impact
SigurRosFan
post Apr 4 2006, 02:05 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



Reporting today:

- http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0604/04deepimpact/

--- Tempel 1 is usually a rather dim, weak comet with a water production rate of 16,000 tonnes per day. However, after the Deep Impact probe hit the comet this rate increased to 40,000 tonnes per day over the period 5-10 days after impact. Over the duration of the outburst, the total mass of water released by the impact was 250,000 tonnes. ---


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Apr 4 2006, 02:16 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



laymans guestimate of implications....

DI spotted a lot of dusty material, and less water than was expected - but ground based obs show lots of water over time following the impact.

So - perhaps what we have is an object that was once a comparatively even mix of dust and ice, but the ice in the upper layers of the body slowly sublimes away under the influence of the warmth of the sun. However, the deeper the ice, the slower it can escape. This leaves the comet being more dust rich near the surface, and more ice rich toward the centre.

You whack it hard, and out flies a huge ammount of the dust, but what you also do is expose some of the more water rich material under the upper layers - so you get an initial outbusrt of dust, and then over the hours and days that follow, the exposed area returns to the dust rich balance near the surface as the sun warms the newly exposed material, forcing the higher water content to sublime out.

Maybe I'm a million miles from the mark, but it would seem to add up.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Apr 4 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Doug:

Sounds reasonable - and all the more reason for a second flyby, if possible, so we can see the evolution of the crater. If the edges of the initial void have boiled away, then we might see Bruce's pet 'sun traps' in action, eroding the surface into strange non-impacty (you know what I mean!) shapes.

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:54 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.