IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LRO's secondary payload decided (already!)
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 7 2006, 03:47 AM
Post #1





Guests






http://www.spaceref.com/calendar/calendar.html?pid=3967 : "Exploration Systems managers will brief news media at 2 p.m. EDT Monday, April 10, about plans to conduct high risk and high return research of the lunar surface using a new spacecraft. The press conference will be held in the NASA Headquarters auditorium, 300 E Street S.W., Washington. The press conference will air live on NASA TV and NASA.gov. Reporters may ask questions from participating NASA locations.

"NASA managers, engineers, and scientists have been reviewing secondary spacecraft proposals that take advantage of the payload capability of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle, the rocket that will launch the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter in October 2008. Associate Administrator for the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Scott Horowitz and lunar program managers will announce the winning proposal and discuss its unique mission."

Courtesy of an Inside Source, I've learned tonight what the choice is -- but I need to tell Simon Mansfield about it first.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Apr 7 2006, 12:19 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I think Space Daily has the story as well -

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/JPL_Set_...ar_Mission.html

I'm guessing that it's a 'dumb' impactor - i.e. one not intended to survive the event. I wonder if they plan to do ranger style imaging on the way in, in which case it's the DI Impactor model basically.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
disownedsky
post Apr 7 2006, 08:38 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 24-January 06
Member No.: 660



QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 7 2006, 08:19 AM) *
I think Space Daily has the story as well -

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/JPL_Set_...ar_Mission.html

I'm guessing that it's a 'dumb' impactor - i.e. one not intended to survive the event. I wonder if they plan to do ranger style imaging on the way in, in which case it's the DI Impactor model basically.

Doug


Hmm.. my best information (probaly not as direct as Moomaw's) is it's NOT the impactor, but we shall see on Monday. I can see the logic though - given the tight cost cap and short schedule, a spacecraft with no science instruments of its own would have the best chance of making it. OTOH, has JPL ever done ANYTHING for 50 million?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 7 2006, 08:41 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (disownedsky @ Apr 7 2006, 08:38 PM) *
has JPL ever done ANYTHING for 50 million?


Sojourner?..umm....

I'm all out smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- BruceMoomaw   LRO's secondary payload decided (already!)   Apr 7 2006, 03:47 AM
- - remcook   already? if they want to launch in 2008, I guess ...   Apr 7 2006, 09:52 AM
- - Analyst   Good guess. There is talk about sending something...   Apr 7 2006, 10:06 AM
- - djellison   I think Space Daily has the story as well - http...   Apr 7 2006, 12:19 PM
|- - disownedsky   QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 7 2006, 08:19 AM) ...   Apr 7 2006, 08:38 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (disownedsky @ Apr 7 2006, 08:38 PM...   Apr 7 2006, 08:41 PM
- - disownedsky   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 6 2006, 11:47 PM...   Apr 7 2006, 01:16 PM
|- - Jim from NSF.com   I heard that it will "loiter" for up to ...   Apr 7 2006, 02:29 PM
- - djellison   Well - loitering means that the impact will have t...   Apr 7 2006, 02:57 PM
|- - Jim from NSF.com   It is not part of LRO but a separate spacecraft. ...   Apr 7 2006, 03:15 PM
- - djellison   Ahh - it just shares the LV, it doesnt deploy from...   Apr 7 2006, 04:05 PM
- - Mariner9   I wonder how many people at JPL are calling this ...   Apr 7 2006, 05:11 PM
- - Myran   QUOTE Mariner9 wrote: I wonder how many people at ...   Apr 7 2006, 09:41 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Late news: I learned this afternoon, to my dismay,...   Apr 8 2006, 03:09 AM
|- - disownedsky   Just watched the announcement, and yep, it's t...   Apr 10 2006, 06:33 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   LRO and secondary payload images: http://www.nasa...   Apr 10 2006, 06:54 PM
- - Spacely   Despite the relatively low cost of both LRO and LC...   Apr 10 2006, 09:15 PM
|- - Jim from NSF.com   QUOTE (Spacely @ Apr 10 2006, 05:15 PM) D...   Apr 10 2006, 10:35 PM
|- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (Spacely @ Apr 10 2006, 09:15 PM) D...   Apr 11 2006, 01:38 AM
|- - disownedsky   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2006, 09:38 P...   Apr 11 2006, 01:37 PM
|- - Spacely   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2006, 06:38 P...   Apr 11 2006, 08:01 PM
|- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (Spacely @ Apr 11 2006, 08:01 PM) T...   Apr 11 2006, 08:21 PM
|- - Spacely   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 11 2006, 01:21 P...   Apr 11 2006, 09:18 PM
- - RNeuhaus   Extract from the The Lunar CRater Observation and ...   Apr 10 2006, 09:58 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   So I fell on my ass big-time on this one -- and, m...   Apr 11 2006, 01:26 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   I've just found this alarming announcement ( h...   Apr 11 2006, 03:22 AM
- - edstrick   LRO is in some ways sort of a Mars Express / Venus...   Apr 11 2006, 09:12 AM
- - remcook   well...lunar diviner is basically a re-fly of MRO ...   Apr 11 2006, 09:18 AM
- - gpurcell   LRO's current projected cost is $396 mill...   Apr 11 2006, 01:21 PM
- - jrdahlman   I loved the headline on today's paper: ...   Apr 11 2006, 04:28 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Here's the final 1991 list, by NASA's Luna...   Apr 12 2006, 01:04 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   As phase 1 of my attempt to pick up the pieces, I...   Apr 12 2006, 10:02 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:11 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.