IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Is Bush's manned lunar plan already coming unravelled?
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 11 2006, 01:43 AM
Post #1





Guests






http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4430

Looks like this bunch has the goods on NASA, in the form of its new internal documents on the major new problems. One proposed solution is to have the CEV hover at the L-2 Earth-Moon Lagrange point 66,000 km above the Moon's farside, while the LSAM lunar lander does all the work of descending into lunar orbit, then landing, and later blasting off all the way back to the L-2 point for its rendezvous with the CEV. "This unconventional technique leads to significant mass savings on the CEV, and surprisingly leads to the same mass on the LSAM. In this case, the CEV fits on the Crew Launch Vehicle [which isn't the case any more for the currently existing plan]; however, the LSAM is still too large for the CaLV [Heavy Lifter] -- though the L2 architecture is closer to meeting the performance limit than the baseline cases examined."

So what's NASA's other plan to deal with the new crisis? Why, to scale down Bush's lunar program to an exact duplicate of Apollo -- two-man LMs capable only of equatorial-zone landings -- except that their stay time would be increased from 3 to 7 days. Inspiring, isn't it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:23 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.