No Driving For Spirit On Sol 38, Minor Glitch |
No Driving For Spirit On Sol 38, Minor Glitch |
Feb 11 2004, 09:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-February 04 Member No.: 14 |
I heard on the news that Spirit was unable to drive today because of a pointing error with the High Gain Antenna. Turns out it was too cold in the morning because it was in the shadow of the Pancam mast.
They use hard stops to calibrate the HGA position and they know they hit the hard stops when the current reaches a certain limit. The limit was set too low for the extreme cold. Very minor problem and they got the HGA to work perfectly later in the day, but the day was wasted troubleshooting. |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 11:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 11-February 04 Member No.: 27 |
A bit worrying that this happened just after the first autonomous drive - it's not a problem with the AE-35 unit, is it?
Rupert |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 11:08 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
No - it seems they understand it very well, it's just not something they expected to happen.
Doug |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 11:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 11-February 04 Member No.: 27 |
Yes, I read the mission report - something like the motors were in shadow so the heaters didn't get them warm enough to give them a reasonable start current, so the computer thought they were stalled at the end stop. Entirely reasonable, although it's a shame to lose a day to what looks like a tolerance calculation mishap!
My reference was to a previous mission where an autonomous system apparently misdiagnosed an aerial pointing subsystem fault, losing contact with Earth and requiring some fairly advanced faultfinding to rectify. Stanley Kubrick did rather a good documentary about it. Rupert |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 11:27 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-February 04 Member No.: 14 |
My guess is the thermal people just made a mistake and forgot to consider the shadow. I'm sure the thermal guys will learn from this and will be more careful in the future.
There are dozens of heaters on the rover for the motors. There isn't enough power to run them all, so they only run heaters before they are about to use a device. I bet they did calculations on how early they had to turn the heater on to get the HGA warm enough to move. However, they likely just used previous data when the sun was on it. So the heaters didn't have enough time to get it warm. From previous press conferences, I know they consider shadows in their models of the solar power system. I wonder if they would consider turning the vehicle in place at the end of every day so that the PMA shadow doesn't land on the HGA. The drive to the crater is probably going to take about ten days and is going to be in the same orientation every day. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 01:47 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |