IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Interesting 2006 LPSC Mars abstracts
edstrick
post Apr 29 2006, 10:55 AM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Intraplate activity can be wildly variable, from near zero in central texas, to recurring isostatic uplift (post glacial rebound) quakes in Illinois and Western NY, to "anomalous" patches like Charlestown, or the New Madrid Fault zone in the lower Mississippi valley.

So I don't know if they were "averaging" all that sort of variety into a "lump sum" or not, but I suspect so.

The Viking seismometer gave us the data to design an instrument that's good enough to do the job whenever we get around to it.

When I was grad-studenting in St. Louis, there was a Richter 4.2 or so quake in central Illinois. In my apt, it felt like a really heavy truck was driving by where one wouln't drive at all. Glasses in the kitchen cabinet made little jingling noises against each other. It faded away after some 5-7 seconds, then came back for a second wave of shudder-tinkle, then faded away. I presumed P and S wave arrivals.

Later, on the local radio, came a cute story. Father was being pestered by kids to get a puppy. He, totally against the idea, said they'd get a puppy when they had an earthquake in St. Louis. The gods must have been listening......

They named the puppy Richter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 29 2006, 12:57 PM
Post #32





Guests






Well, that's certainly true -- the most gigantic earthquake in modern North American history, after all, occurred smack in the middle of the North American plate. But I was referring to average intraplate levels, which are undeniably a lot lower than those on plate edges.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Apr 29 2006, 02:44 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Ah -- you refer to the quake along the New Madrid fault, back in the 1800s, which moved the then-capitol of Illinois from Illinois into Missouri?

I kid you not -- the capital of Illinois was Kaskaskia, a port city along the Mississippi River. The legal definition of the border between Illinois and Missouri was the river itself; the center of the river was (and still is) the state line. The quake caused the river to re-route itself into a topographic low (that it had probably already flowed through once, eons ago) and moved the river from the west of Kaskaskia to the east of most of the town. The center of the town was literally inundated in the new river's path.

Fairly shortly after this event, the capitol of Illinois was moved to Centralia, which, as its name implies, sits right in the center of the state. It was another couple of decades before the capitol was finally moved to its current location, in Springfield.

But that quake is still the only one I've ever heard of that moved a state capitol into a neighboring state!

Sorry for the off-topic post, but it seemed to fit here.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Apr 30 2006, 07:31 AM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



I just love "Factinos" like that. They're fun.
Note that's a Factino, not a Factoid, which is something that looks like a fact but ain't!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 12:02 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.