My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Mystery of the Megaflood on NOVA PBS-TV |
May 12 2006, 08:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Next on NOVA: "Mystery of the Megaflood"
http://www.pbs.org/nova/megaflood Broadcast: May 16, 2006 at 8 p.m. ET/PT (Repeat) (NOVA airs Tuesdays on PBS at 8 p.m. Check your local listings as dates and times may vary.) One of the Earth's strangest geological riddles is the evidence for a huge catastrophe that struck eastern Washington State thousands of years ago. It took scientists decades to figure out that a colossal flood had carved out bizarre landscape features strewn across thousands of square miles. On "Mystery of the Megaflood," NOVA gets to the bottom of what created this compelling detective story. The program features a dogged geologist sticking to his bold theory for decades despite virtual professional banishment. Eventually, other geologists joined his cause and filled in the intricate details, which NOVA recreates in stunning computer animation to show what may be one of the most spectacular series of events ever to occur on our planet. Here's what you'll find on the companion Web site: Interview & Article Fantastic Floods In this interview, learn what megafloods can tell us about Mars, the nature of science, and more. Ice Age Lake What would Glacial Lake Missoula have looked like before its disastrous emptyings? Find out here. Interactives Explore the Scablands Examine the evidence left by the violent floods. Stumbling Upon a Treasure Try your hand at our gee-whiz geology quiz. Also, Links & Books, the Teacher's Guide, the program transcript, and more. http://www.pbs.org/nova/megaflood -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
| Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
May 12 2006, 10:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
Interesting, pity they don't provide aerial views to compare with Mars floods.
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
This is why hardly anyone builds major dams out of ice any more.
Interesting, pity they don't provide aerial views to compare with Mars floods.
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 11:08 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Richard:
Um. Victor Baker is, and always has been, a *leetle* bit enthusiastic about the scablands... ...I confess that catastrophism is not a style of geology which I find enticing! Still, dramatic things can happen - I simply prefer long, slow processes to have been considered to death *first*... ...and there's lots of comparison photos between the scablands and Mars in his book, but they all suffer from being what (today) we have to call low-res Mars images. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
May 13 2006, 11:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
Hmmmm... difficult to conclude, with only Google Earth. We see more corn fields shapes than geological shapes.
Richard: Um. Victor Baker is, and always has been, a *leetle* bit enthusiastic about the scablands... ...I confess that catastrophism is not a style of geology which I find enticing! Still, dramatic things can happen - I simply prefer long, slow processes to have been considered to death *first*... ...and there's lots of comparison photos between the scablands and Mars in his book, but they all suffer from being what (today) we have to call low-res Mars images. Bob Shaw Yes, I am not convinced that there was such a large flood here, although it is still perfectly possible. Large floods from glacial lakes are a very real phenomenon in the Himalayas, where there are regularly catastrophic "flash floods" when a glacier or a moraine breaks. In Bhutan it happened several times recently, and in Nepal there is a legend on a valley completelly destroyed with all its inhabitants, and the traces of a huge landslide are actualy visible in the place. There are also traces of this in France, in the Pyrenées. That such phenomenon could happen at a larger scale is possible. The problem is that short large floods can quickly erode sands or clays, but they will most of the time left rocks in place. This anyways poses a problem with large flood valleys on mars, which look as if they were carved in sand, when we know they are carved into lava flows. We never see for instance a large valley narrowing when it comes into a mountainous place. I think we should not reanimate the old debate between catastrophism and slow processes. It was a debate some centuries ago, but now in front of all the variety of processes we know are working into geology, such a distinction/opposition don't make sense. In France there are large lava flows 30kms long, and on Venus the record is set at 6000kms! not to speak of the catastrophes at best: large meteorite impacts, with all the strong modification they provoque into biology and climate. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:07 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|