IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A new solar system, Possible habitable star system.
Toymaker
post May 17 2006, 05:57 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 20-February 06
From: Poland, Wroclaw
Member No.: 685



http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v441/...ature04828.html
Over the past two years, the search for low-mass extrasolar planets has led to the detection of seven so-called 'hot Neptunes' or 'super-Earths' around Sun-like stars. These planets have masses 5–20 times larger than the Earth and are mainly found on close-in orbits with periods of 2–15 days. Here we report a system of three Neptune-mass planets with periods of 8.67, 31.6 and 197 days, orbiting the nearby star HD 69830. This star was already known to show an infrared excess possibly caused by an asteroid belt within 1 au (the Sun–Earth distance). Simulations show that the system is in a dynamically stable configuration. Theoretical calculations favour a mainly rocky composition for both inner planets, while the outer planet probably has a significant gaseous envelope surrounding its rocky/icy core; the outer planet orbits within the habitable zone of this star.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ljk4-1
post May 18 2006, 02:46 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



While these planets themselves may not harbor life, I wonder about
any moons circling them?

The potential for tidally heated icy and temperate moons around exoplanets

Authors: Caleb A. Scharf

Comments: 28 pages, 8 Figures, AASTex, Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604413


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 19 2006, 04:53 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ May 18 2006, 09:46 AM) *
While these planets themselves may not harbor life, I wonder about
any moons circling them?

Well, hmm... depending on the age of the planetary system, any such moon of a Neptune-mass planet within the habitable belt of a star would have to share certain properties with Earth (enough mass to hold on to an atmosphere, liquid water on the surface, a magnetic field to protect the planet from both the solar wind and the primary's radiation belts, etc.) such that life could develop.

As long as all of those conditions exist, I don't see why life couldn't develop on such moons.

Of course, the star-wiggle technique will likely never be able to identify Earth-sized moons of hot Jupiters or hot Neptunes (or even temperate versions of similarly-massed planets). So we'll need SIM and TPF to get even the first clue as to how many of those there might be out there.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:14 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.