IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The view from..., Places Apollo was going to go, but didn't.
dvandorn
post May 22 2006, 07:39 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



This is a subject I brought up several years ago on Usenet, and I still have an interest in it.

There were several landing sites heavily scrutinized for Apollo landings. There were four alternate landing sites for the G mission, for example. There was an alternate landing site for Apollo 12. And there were landing site proposals for many places that never 'made the cut' for an actual mission. Several of these sites had detailed planning put into them, including traverse planning.

It seems to me that it is now possible, with our knowledge of how the lunar surface looks in general and of how major terrain features look in specific, to use CGI techniques to create panoramas from landing sites and traverse stops from Apollo missions that never flew.

For example, the Apollo 14 crew spent several months training for a landing at Littrow -- a site out on Mare Serenitatis about 45 km from the later Taurus-Littrow site -- which was designed to sample the dark mantling unit and to visit a wrinkle ridge. It was a nice H-mission landing site, available in late summer and early fall of 1970. (Had Apollo 14 flew later than this, the landing site would have been near the crater Censorinus -- for which similar detailed planning was done.)

There were also detailed plans made for Alphonsus, Davy, Gassendi, Copernicus and Tycho landings. All included a number of traverse plan concepts and sampling site recommendations.

I would really enjoy seeing these vistas that, for the roll of the dice, might have been seen by American moonwalkers in the 1970s.

I know that Phil Stooke is working on a book... any idea if we might see something like this in it..?

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- dvandorn   The view from...   May 22 2006, 07:39 AM
- - Bob Shaw   oDoug: Ages back I posted some Copernicus images ...   May 22 2006, 01:49 PM
- - Phil Stooke   dvandorn asks: "I know that Phil Stooke is w...   May 22 2006, 03:02 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   oDoug: Here are the other Copernicus images (the ...   May 22 2006, 03:09 PM
- - Phil Stooke   And an example... five possible sites at Hadley, a...   May 22 2006, 03:22 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   Phil: Is C at site 5? Bob Shaw   May 22 2006, 03:33 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Yes. Phil   May 22 2006, 03:46 PM
- - gndonald   Phil, The more 'snippets' I see from your...   May 22 2006, 04:07 PM
- - Phil Stooke   It goes to the publisher in about October (impact ...   May 22 2006, 05:12 PM
|- - ElkGroveDan   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 22 2006, 09:12 A...   May 26 2006, 02:10 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Don't forget the Marius Hills, which apparentl...   May 23 2006, 01:14 AM
- - dvandorn   I've heard the same thing, Bruce, but I've...   May 26 2006, 02:00 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   IF I remember correctly (and I'm nowhere near ...   May 26 2006, 04:34 AM
- - Phil Stooke   I don't have a quote in front of me, but my re...   May 26 2006, 12:38 PM
- - gndonald   Phil, Is site '2' the landing site for t...   Mar 28 2007, 03:32 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Many possible mission scenarios were considered as...   Mar 28 2007, 03:44 PM
|- - monitorlizard   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 28 2007, 09:44 A...   Apr 1 2007, 08:30 PM
|- - gndonald   QUOTE (monitorlizard @ Apr 2 2007, 04:30 ...   Apr 2 2007, 02:19 AM
- - gndonald   Thanks Phil, for answering my queries, and I thoug...   Apr 1 2007, 01:32 AM
- - edstrick   There was a long and somewhat acrimonious arguemen...   Apr 1 2007, 08:07 AM
- - monitorlizard   For those of you who can't wait for Phil Stook...   May 15 2007, 11:57 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:21 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.