IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

18 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity in a sandtrap, again, A thread for the topic
akuo
post May 29 2006, 08:15 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Oppy looks like to be stuck in a dune once more!

The front wheels (rover was moving backwards into the dune) look to be closer to solid surface than during the purgatory incident, so hopefully they can back out pretty quickly.

I know this is already being discussed in the other thread, but I think this way the incident is clearer to a casual reader of the forum. Threads of nearly 1000 posts clog the discussion anyway.

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GBP1151R0M1.JPG

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GBP1311R0M1.JPG

inline images changed to links. 2048 x 1024 of images clogs discussions as well - Doug


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 29 2006, 08:19 AM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14434
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



A whole lot of doom and gloom when we don't know how stuck it is, how much driving took place.

Remember the mini-purgatory back toward the NE rim of Erebus. They were out of it a sol later, Give it 2 sols....THEN maybe there's grounds to be slightly nervous, but even then, we got out of Purgatory, this will be a breeze.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post May 29 2006, 08:32 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I agree Doug it's not anywhere near as bad a Purgatory, I think we'll get out fine.

I do think it's much worse than the other event that we got out of straight away though.

---

Was this the other event?

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...FSP1235R0M1.JPG

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...FSP1335L0M1.JPG


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post May 29 2006, 08:44 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Assuming it was (Edit: it was, thanks Tesh) - the tracking site says there was about 5m of driving to get into that (and the rover made 1-2m) in this case we apparently have 24m of driving. Still, a lot less than at Purgatory (50m+ iirc)


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post May 29 2006, 08:58 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



The rear wheels don't seem to be as deep in the muck as they were during Purgatory.
Attached Image


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post May 29 2006, 09:18 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Okay Akuo. This significate that it's not desperate?
There is an other thing : the rock layer seems to be less deeper than the first time Oppy was "jailed" by sand. Is the wheel can touch this layer and the rover roll onto?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post May 29 2006, 09:35 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I must admit that the situation is not clear to me. If you look the tracks, you can see that we moved backward at first then came back to the outcrop and finaly moved backward again... and there is NO sand in the direction we're driving so, we're FREE, aren't we?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post May 29 2006, 09:55 AM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



QUOTE (climber @ May 29 2006, 09:35 AM) *
If you look the tracks, you can see that we moved backward at first then came back to the outcrop and finaly moved backward again... and there is NO sand in the direction we're driving so, we're FREE, aren't we?


I don't think so. Looks like Oppy is plain backwards driving mode for this, and they just zigzagged around that flat piece of outcrop. Oppy executed a turn a few metres back from the place she is now. Then it was straight (backwards driving) into the dune and stopping there for whatever reason - either because of the end of the commanded drive or the slip protection stopping her.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post May 29 2006, 10:12 AM
Post #9





Guests






Indeed jamescanvin, it was supposedly 24 m of driving, question are if the slippage detection did cut in or not.
Even though im usually pessimistic about most things, this time im not, to me its looks less severe than Purgatory and more similar to that 'slightly stuck' situation we had some time after that. In short, I view this as one small unforseen delay on the trek towards Victoria and nothing more.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vladimorka
post May 29 2006, 10:35 AM
Post #10


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
Member No.: 224



This is what happens when JPLers don't follow Tesh's route :-)

Rover drivers, take your lesson and stick to the blue line :-)))
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 29 2006, 10:46 AM
Post #11


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14434
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



where's the 24m figure coming from?

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post May 29 2006, 10:49 AM
Post #12





Guests






Hopefully no Purgatory-Dune scenario !
It took the JPL-team about 5 weeks to get the MER out of its dug-in position ( Oppy was stuck from sol 446 to sol 484 ) ... fingers crossed ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post May 29 2006, 10:52 AM
Post #13


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ May 29 2006, 11:49 AM) *
Hopefully no Purgatory-Dune scenario !
It took the JPL-team about 5 weeks to get the MER out of its dug-in position ( Oppy was stuck from sol 446 to sol 484 ) ... fingers crossed ohmy.gif


Humm...It looks like everyone is arriving to watch the accident... ph34r.gif

I've got hope on seing Oppy out of there in less than a week...Let's vote?... laugh.gif
Just kidding Doug... wink.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post May 29 2006, 12:10 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (djellison @ May 29 2006, 08:46 PM) *
where's the 24m figure coming from?


That's the distance from the tracking database.

Example:

..sol/832..::71::233::10.5673::-65.9588::-0.0208675
..sol/833..::71::327::12.1891::-89.7695::-2.32683

Last three numbers (I think) are: distance east, distance north & distance 'down' from 7100 in merters. As has been discussed at length in the route map thread these usually tally pretty well with Tesh's route map.

It's also very unusual to see such a large z displacement - I guess what has happened here is the rover knows it was pitched down for the whole drive and so after 24m forward it should have gone down ~2m.

I'll dig up these numbers for Purgatory and Near Purgatory, stand by.

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 29 2006, 12:20 PM
Post #15


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14434
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Ahh - it may well be that 24m was the expected drive distance, but some in-drive visidom killed it. Those figures sound like the expected position based on predrive imaging.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

18 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd September 2024 - 03:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.