My Assistant
Nature (June 1, 2006) |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
May 31 2006, 04:42 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The June 1, 2006, issue of Nature has a new paper by Nimmo and Pappalardo entitled "Diapir-induced reorientation of Saturn's moon Enceladus" as well as an accompanying News and Views piece by Paul Hanlon. For the specific links, see the Editor's Summary.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
May 31 2006, 07:24 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
Just as a sidenote: Looking up Saturn's orbital velocity about the Sun and Enceladus' orbital velocity about Saturn, it turns out that Enceladus is faster: about 12-13 km/s versus 9.6 for Saturn around the Sun. So Enceladus' angular velocity with respect to the Sun changes sign; it can move "backwards" as Saturn continues to move forwards.
This has got to cut down on the chances of Enceladus being "hit from behind" in a big way. When its velocity vector is parallel with Saturn's, could anything on a non-hyperbolic orbit around the Sun actually catch up with it? There's always the chance of being hit from the side by chance, of course, but statistically speaking the leading side really should take the brunt of the beating. I always sort of felt that the idea of leading/trailing hemisphere asymmetry in crater counts was a bit of a pipe dream, due to the sheer number of craters involved, and "crater saturation" (though on Enceladus that may not be a huge issue). For outer moons like Iapetus where the moon's orbital velocity isn't a substantial fraction of Saturn's, this could be true... but in Enceladus' case one would think that it ought to be a noticeable effect (stressing here "ought to be")... |
|
|
|
AlexBlackwell Nature (June 1, 2006) May 31 2006, 04:42 PM
AlexBlackwell NASA-funded Study Says Saturn's Moon Enceladus... May 31 2006, 05:26 PM
Stephen QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ May 31 2006, 05:26... Jun 1 2006, 02:22 AM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ May 31 2006, 04:42... May 31 2006, 06:19 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ May 31 2006, 11:19... May 31 2006, 06:47 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ May 31 2006, 06:19... Jun 9 2006, 12:25 AM
JRehling QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ May 31 2006, 12:24 ... Jun 1 2006, 05:18 PM
BruceMoomaw One piece of supporting evidence absolutely jumps ... May 31 2006, 11:15 PM
BruceMoomaw It rolled over on its own, because it was sufferin... Jun 1 2006, 09:04 AM
BruceMoomaw What the hell am I thinking?! As the "Na... Jun 1 2006, 01:16 PM
vexgizmo QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jun 1 2006, 07:16 AM... Jun 1 2006, 11:52 PM
BruceMoomaw Pappalardo and Nimmo's LPSC abstract on the id... Jun 1 2006, 10:51 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jun 1 2006, 03:51 PM... Jun 3 2006, 06:47 PM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jun 3 2006, 06:47 PM... Jun 4 2006, 01:35 AM
vexgizmo QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jun 3 2006, 11:47 AM... Jun 4 2006, 06:01 AM
volcanopele QUOTE (vexgizmo @ Jun 3 2006, 11:01 PM) D... Jun 4 2006, 06:22 PM
angel1801 Yes, there is a big gap in the coverage of Encelad... Jun 5 2006, 08:54 AM
BruceMoomaw Hmmm. Is it possible that the ice shell swivelled... Jun 3 2006, 02:50 AM
The Messenger How strong is Saturn's magnetic field at the o... Jun 3 2006, 12:37 PM
volcanopele hmm, perhaps through saturn-shine. the illuminate... Jun 5 2006, 06:35 PM
Tom Tamlyn Bob Pappalardo and the June 1 Nature paper on Ence... Jun 7 2006, 08:25 PM
volcanopele I'm still in shock that Bob's at JPL... Jun 7 2006, 10:48 PM
ngunn A great big thanks for that. I'm sure there m... Jun 9 2006, 12:15 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (ngunn @ Jun 9 2006, 12:15 PM) A gr... Jun 9 2006, 04:12 PM
BruceMoomaw Yes -- especially since "Nature" usually... Jun 10 2006, 02:07 AM
vexgizmo And a big thanks to Volcanopele for so thoroughly ... Jun 10 2006, 06:14 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (vexgizmo @ Jun 10 2006, 11:14 AM) ... Jul 10 2006, 07:13 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:55 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|