IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Presenting..., the other moons of Saturn
remcook
post Jul 4 2004, 08:57 AM
Post #1


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



Iapetus: amazingly black-and-white

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7097

Rhea:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7106

Tethys:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7107
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
remcook
post Jul 4 2004, 08:58 AM
Post #2


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



Mimas! Huh?! huh.gif Cut in half?! why the sharp terminator (and in the first one there is also light coming from the side, but that could be from saturn)? in the scond one you see the large crater I think.

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7030

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7108

Dione:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7033
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 4 2004, 10:06 AM
Post #3





Guests






How did they all end up overexposed lol
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 4 2004, 11:33 AM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



This is the problem - they probabyl are not overexposed, but the stretching done - probably automatically - before they get dumped onto the web basically RUINS the pictures! GRGRGGRRGRG

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 4 2004, 11:49 AM
Post #5





Guests






Reading through the RAW image FAQ it says the images haven't been processed in any way. There is also a section on why some images are over exposed.



Why is the image overexposed?

Cassini's cameras have 63 different exposure settings, from 5 milliseconds to 20 minutes. Scientists planning an observation must choose the exposure for each image taken. That can be tough if you're taking a picture of something you've never seen before. Thus, incomplete information on how bright something can be can lead to an underexposed or overexposed image.

Images can be overexposed on purpose too. If the scientist is looking for something dim next to something bright, the bright thing may be overexposed. Finally, Optical Navigation personnel use images to see where Cassini is relative to Saturn and its moons. Often they overexpose images because they need to see where these moons are in relation to the stars in the background sky.



Why does the image look sideways or upside down?

When a photographer tilts his or her camera to best fit the scene, the resulting images may appear sideways or at an angle. The same is true for Cassini - the images reflect the orientation of the photographer, in this case the spacecraft. The images on this web page have not been processed in any way, so there is no guarantee that the images will consistently show North at the top of the frame. [B]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 4 2004, 11:51 AM
Post #6





Guests






There's a lovely new wide angle shot of Saturn and its rings:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...feiImageID=7032
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 4 2004, 01:38 PM
Post #7


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I think our man on the inside can confirm there is more detail in those images than we get to see in the 'raw' jpgs

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 6 2004, 03:46 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



They look fine to me smile.gif I think I can smuggle you a few unprocessed but non-saturated versions of those images.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 6 2004, 09:10 AM
Post #9


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jul 6 2004, 03:46 AM)
They look fine to me smile.gif I think I can smuggle you a few unprocessed but non-saturated versions of those images.

It's the difference between a botched 8bit JPG, and a lovely 12bit PROPER raw image I guess smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 6 2004, 11:17 AM
Post #10





Guests






I did notice the majority of the distant pictures of Phoebe appear over-exposed. The RAW image FAQ states they haven't been processed in any way, so what exactly happens to these RAW images before they're placed on the web?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 6 2004, 12:02 PM
Post #11


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jul 6 2004, 11:17 AM)
I did notice the majority of the distant pictures of Phoebe appear over-exposed. The RAW image FAQ states they haven't been processed in any way, so what exactly happens to these RAW images before they're placed on the web?

They get..umm. processed smile.gif They have to be - most of the images taken are 12bit images - and a JPG can only be 8bit - so there HAS to be processing by default. That processing is done automatically I assume - and the algorythm for it is a bit stupid - it just takes the brightest thing in the scene and makes that white, and the darkest thing in the scene and makes that black - and interpolates ( badly ) inbetween.

If it was done more intelligently, we would see moon detail - I am sure. You dont build a multi-billion $ spacecraft, fly it billions of miles, and then get your exposures THAT wrong biggrin.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 7 2004, 12:27 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Here is Mimas
Attached image(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 7 2004, 12:29 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Here is Enceladus
Attached image(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 7 2004, 12:31 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Here is Tethys. Note the N-S assymmetry.
Attached image(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 7 2004, 12:33 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Here is Dione.
Attached image(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:44 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.