My Assistant
Dune Thread |
Jun 27 2006, 10:35 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1621 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
The view toward Beagle is more and more precise.
http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/a...CNP2435R2M1.JPG The crater place seems to be a bit complex. -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 27 2006, 02:50 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 255 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 135 |
Looks like lots of chunks lying around. Its going to be very interesting to see how they have interacted with the sand du, er ripples. Which leads me to another thought...
There have been lots of discussions on the tiny craters, etc, and whether they are caused by sapping or are tiny impact craters. I've been puzzling over this for ages (I'm not a geologist, btw). It seems to me that the dunes must be static now, otherwise the wind that we know blows over the plains would fill in the craters by moving the sand. They must have been mobile at some point, otherwise they wouldn't have the wind-sculpted shapes. This means they *must* have been mobile at one point. I'm finding it hard to understand how slow hardening could result in preservation of the ripple shapes, so it ocurred to me that it might not have been so slow. We know that the apron of Victoria is splash-like, which might imply water. So perhaps the impact released a cloud of water vapour that interacted with the very fine, very dry sand, and essentially fixed it in place. Am I talking nonsense? Chris |
|
|
|
Jul 4 2006, 04:10 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Looking at the bedding in the ripples, you can see that there are some compositional changes over time in the grain deposition. That's the only way you get this kind of bedding.
So, the layers in the ripples (which seem relatively evenly spaced) speak to epochs of ripple deposition, I think. The way that the layers tend to have partially-cemented surfaces (similat to the cementing we see on the surfaces of the ripples today) hint that each of these layers was once the surface of the ripple. So, what could occur in epochs on Mars that would result in the building of material on top of existing, surface-cemented (and therefore probably relaytively static for a time) ripples? Cyclic, drastic climate change, due to Mars' extreme wobble, could just fit the model. I think. So, perhaps we are seeing layering in these ripples that is built up every time Mars goes through a given portion of its extreme climate cycle. Possibly, you only get rapid ripple/dune deposition during those times when the maximum amount of Mars' atmosphere is gaseous for the greatest amount of time during the year. I'm not sure which portion of the climate cycle would offer these conditions -- but I bet the planetary climatologists will have it all figured out in a decade or two... -the other Doug -------------------- The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:29 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|