My Assistant
Dune Thread |
Jun 27 2006, 02:50 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 255 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 135 |
Looks like lots of chunks lying around. Its going to be very interesting to see how they have interacted with the sand du, er ripples. Which leads me to another thought...
There have been lots of discussions on the tiny craters, etc, and whether they are caused by sapping or are tiny impact craters. I've been puzzling over this for ages (I'm not a geologist, btw). It seems to me that the dunes must be static now, otherwise the wind that we know blows over the plains would fill in the craters by moving the sand. They must have been mobile at some point, otherwise they wouldn't have the wind-sculpted shapes. This means they *must* have been mobile at one point. I'm finding it hard to understand how slow hardening could result in preservation of the ripple shapes, so it ocurred to me that it might not have been so slow. We know that the apron of Victoria is splash-like, which might imply water. So perhaps the impact released a cloud of water vapour that interacted with the very fine, very dry sand, and essentially fixed it in place. Am I talking nonsense? Chris |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:24 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|