My Assistant
Site Message
Martian Space Race, MERs vs. MSL, Pasteur and... Lunokhods |
 Jul 6 2006, 11:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744  |
I am having difficulty finding decent comparison data, especially for the planned ExoMars's Pasteur rover as well as the planned MSL and ancient L's. I keep wondering: if we put them all at Oppy's current position, which one would be the first to reach Victoria's rim? I guess one should take into consideration not only the average speed (which I have never seen presented in a nice table for comparison) but also maneuverability and modes of navigation...
-------------------- |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jul 10 2006, 06:16 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Wonderful! I've made several, probably somewhat desultory, internet searches for Lunakhod science returns over the past several years and have found next to nothing (including very little, as is obvious from my comments, about the actual existence of geoscience sensors on either craft)... it's good to know that something is out there somewhere.
Is there anything in those results that fits poorly with Apollo-based lunar models? Or have they even been analyzed as part of the model-creation-and-maintenance process? -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
karolp Martian Space Race Jul 6 2006, 11:42 AM
djellison Well - I would put Exomars on a similar footage to... Jul 6 2006, 11:47 AM Bob Shaw QUOTE (karolp @ Jul 6 2006, 12:42 PM) I a... Jul 6 2006, 11:48 AM
JRehling This is a fun basis of comparison, but remember th... Jul 6 2006, 05:48 PM Phil Stooke The longest Lunokhod drive was 3130 m on 18 Februa... Jul 7 2006, 01:11 PM dvandorn In re the drive-to concept:
The thing that bother... Jul 7 2006, 04:07 PM JRehling QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jul 7 2006, 09:07 AM) I... Jul 7 2006, 06:59 PM djellison I think you have to be sensible. You land - do sc... Jul 7 2006, 04:41 PM Phil Stooke I'm sure the old Apollo idea of a contingency ... Jul 8 2006, 10:31 AM edstrick Beyond that... ANY sample will yield new science w... Jul 8 2006, 10:44 AM dvandorn I will make a point about the Lunakhods... yes, th... Jul 8 2006, 04:25 PM tedstryk Actually, the Lunokhods had other instruments, inc... Jul 8 2006, 08:49 PM DonPMitchell There are papers by Grant Kocharov about the Lunok... Jul 9 2006, 08:38 PM DonPMitchell I've seen his papers cited, and some are on th... Jul 10 2006, 07:47 AM edstrick One of the Lunokhods had sky-brightness photometer... Jul 10 2006, 10:18 AM SacramentoBob QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 10 2006, 03:18 AM) ... Jul 24 2006, 06:09 PM nprev Hmm....I understand the implications for optical M... Jul 12 2006, 03:28 PM Phil Stooke Those dust storms are not too stormy. This link:
... Jul 24 2006, 06:29 PM |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:36 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|
