IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Martian Space Race, MERs vs. MSL, Pasteur and... Lunokhods
edstrick
post Jul 10 2006, 10:18 AM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



One of the Lunokhods had sky-brightness photometers which (as I recall) detected significant sky brightness during twilight and the daytime, apparently due to sunlight scattered by ?electrostatically? levitated (or otherwise suborbitally lifted) dust.

The ASSUMPTION that the lunar sky is perfectly black in the daytime is probably not true and indicates that even telescopes that are well-shielded from sunlight or lunar-surface reflected light will have lunar-dust-atmosphere interference during the day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 12 2006, 03:28 PM
Post #17


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Hmm....I understand the implications for optical Moon-based observations, but how about radio astronomy? I remember all the talk about the farside being the only truly radio-quiet locale in the Solar System...would this phenomenon produce significant interference in certain bands, or even gunk up a high-gain antenna?

Come to that, does the Moon in fact have a sort of virtual Heaviside layer as a result of this which might make the farside not as radio-quiet as was generally thought?


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SacramentoBob
post Jul 24 2006, 06:09 PM
Post #18


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 6-July 06
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 958



QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 10 2006, 03:18 AM) *
One of the Lunokhods had sky-brightness photometers which (as I recall) detected significant sky brightness during twilight and the daytime, apparently due to sunlight scattered by ?electrostatically? levitated (or otherwise suborbitally lifted) dust.

The ASSUMPTION that the lunar sky is perfectly black in the daytime is probably not true and indicates that even telescopes that are well-shielded from sunlight or lunar-surface reflected light will have lunar-dust-atmosphere interference during the day.



Pardon me for barging in on your discussion. There is an interesting article about electrostatically charged lunar dust particles at: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2005/pdf/1899.pdf ; Apollo and Lunar Surveyor observations indicate that there MIGHT be Lunar "Dust Storms" at the on-set of twilight on the Moon! - Sacramento Bob
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2006, 06:29 PM
Post #19


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10253
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Those dust storms are not too stormy. This link:

http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/spac...pr01/spudis.htm

(1/3 down the page) points out that the Apollo lunar reflectors are not at all affected by dust after more than 30 years. I've seen similar comments by the laser people themselves.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 12:05 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.