My Assistant
NASA to revise Mars program |
Jul 6 2006, 02:00 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 11-December 04 Member No.: 120 |
http://www.space.com/news/060706_mars_report.html
quote: The review group also flagged “the extraordinary resilience” of the Spirit and Opportunity rovers still at work on the red planet. Success of that Mars machinery “strongly suggests that a prudent, risk-reduction strategy is to use their design as a basis for the proposed Mid Rovers,” the committee stated. RIGHT! Would you believe it. We're going to do it all over again! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 6 2006, 09:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I can see where you are coming from.
Science Comittee's should outline the priority science, the order of how they'd like things to be investigated. Engineers should then examine that, and propose a series of missions to do those investigations Then politicians given them 10th as much money as any of it needs. BUT - Are the engineers going to be guilty of designing the things they WANT to design instead of the 'best' (be that quickest, cheapest or whatever ) way to go and do those investigations. That's the ever-present tensions - engineers and scientists, questions and answers, ying and yang blah blah blah I think MER has produced an orgy or people wanting to reuse the platform, but even Squyres admits that it's not ideal. There's a certain fondness for the platform, a belief that because two of them have worked, that if you sent two more you would get another 2 x 800+ sols of exploration. I think two of everything makes sense, historically it's made sense as well. Viking, Voyager, Mariner, Viking, MER. I'm dissapointed that NH2 was not selected, and I'd have thought that an MSL2 would have made quite a lot of sense as well....but as ever, the money just isn't there. There are situation when many copies of a vehicle make sense. Comms sats, weather sats, and obviously something like a netlander mission would justify many copies of the same probe...ditto impactors etc. But more MER's, 5,6 years after they started building the first two, wouldn't make as much sense as say, investing the same cash in doing 2 MSL's. The current problem I guess is that we have a load of questions, but don't really know where to go to get the answers. Doug |
|
|
|
Cugel NASA to revise Mars program Jul 6 2006, 02:00 PM
djellison Well - to be fair - your subject is a bit of gun-j... Jul 6 2006, 02:54 PM
Cugel Yeah, you're right Doug.
Still, it's a pr... Jul 6 2006, 03:10 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 6 2006, 08:10 AM) Just... Jul 6 2006, 03:20 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jul 6 2006, 04:20 PM)... Jul 6 2006, 03:28 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jul 6 2006, 03:20 PM)... Jul 6 2006, 04:09 PM

ElkGroveDan QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 6 2006, 08:0... Jul 6 2006, 05:00 PM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jul 6 2006, 07:20 AM)... Jul 6 2006, 04:57 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Jul 6 2006, 09:57 AM... Jul 6 2006, 06:51 PM
Bob Shaw Skip all them instruments if you will - but give m... Jul 6 2006, 07:36 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jul 6 2006, 06:51 PM)... Jul 6 2006, 07:51 PM
Myran In reply to some of the suggestions made here:
T... Jul 6 2006, 06:00 PM
djellison Come on then MC - what would you like to see flown... Jul 6 2006, 07:43 PM
Cugel Let's not forget that MER was banking heavily ... Jul 6 2006, 09:36 PM
AlexBlackwell This 52-page NRC report, Review of the Next Decade... Jul 7 2006, 09:13 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:25 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|