My Assistant
T7 RADAR SAR swath, September 7, 2005 - now on PDS |
Jul 14 2006, 07:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 571 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Silesia Member No.: 299 |
T7 swath released !
PDS - Cassini Radar Volcanopele ! Time for update your site. Titan RADAR SAR Swaths -------------------- Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 14 2006, 08:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
It should be updated on Monday.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2006, 09:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2006, 04:18 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Thanks, Alan, for all of us impatient types!
I'm seeing several circular features in this swath -- if I didn't know any better (and I don't), I'd say they look like subdued impact features which have been mostly eroded into nothingness. Perhaps overlaid by sedimentary deposits. But I see lots of what really look, to me, like old craters. (Especially near the top of the lower third of the swath, above the obvious large flow feature that trends from bottom to top.) This is one of the first times I'd say we see what looks like typical cratered terrain anywhere in the Titan radar swaths... even if it's been eroded to near-flatness. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2006, 09:27 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#6
|
||
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10265 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
The speckly nature of SAR images can make them difficult to interpret. Here I have suppressed it. Maybe this is a bit easier to look at. Well, maybe... but is it an area of alluvial deposits? The patterns of streaks might suggest it, but I don't see anything conclusive. More context would help, seeing for instance if a channel feeds into it or if it occurs at the foot of a range of hills.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
||
Jul 16 2006, 11:06 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
Phil, I linked to a smaller version of the entire swath in this thread.
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...=2745&st=29 |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 04:21 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Director of Galilean Photography ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
Or it could be a bunch of dust-devil trails.
-------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 12:45 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10265 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Thanks, alan. I had missed that. Well, the context does look promising. Two long channels cutting through a mottled area, opening into a smooth flat area. Could be alluvial. This really makes you want a good DEM, though! The next mission just has to give us global SAR and topography...
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 05:30 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
It should be updated on Monday. And it was! Thanks, Jason http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~perry/RADAR/ -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 06:01 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
I have added the T7 swath to my RADAR swath page:
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~perry/RADAR/ Unlike Alan, I used the BIFQI version of the file. From the looks of it, the pixel values range from 0.05 to 1.4 or so, so I am guessing in this product, the pixel values have been converted to dielectric constant or some RADAR equivalent to I/F, like I do with ISS images while the BIBQI version uses the actual brightness values. the "F" version may also be corrected for incidence angle (or emission angle or what ever...). I would ask our resident RADAR team member, but I'm not sure he is in town. I should also point out that the file has been rotated 90 degrees CCW from what is in the PDS. Also, if anyone wants lat-lon gridded versions at 128 pixels/deg., let me know. EDIT: If I looked in the label file, I would find my answer... "The data values in this file are Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) normalized backscatter cross-section values. The values are physical scale (not in dB) and have been corrected for incidence-angle effects. The raw backscatter values have been multiplied by the function f(I), where I is the incidence angle and f(I) = 1.4142*sin(I)." -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 07:05 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
I went to drain the kiddie pool yesterday, and discovered a bunch of that silicate stuff they pack into diapers had leaked into the pool. I realized the density of this sandy jell is slightly greater than that of the water, which may correlate somewhat with the density of surface materials on Titan, relative to the atmosphere.
I played around a bit, swirling or setting up waves in the pool, then watching how the 'dust' settled. It is easy to create swirling patterns, and roundish blotches, a little more difficult to set up wave patterns (like Titan's dunes) - the flow has to alternate directionally at nearly 180deg angles, and any swirly motion quickly disrupts them. I could only get alluvial patterns by setting up patterns in the underlying plastic. Before the dust settled, the alluvial patterns are dark, afterwards, light. I know this may sound silly, but it could explain why some of the alluvial patterns on Titan seem to be light and others dark - it could be a function of age, emissivity, and whether or not the 'sand' that seems to dominate the cat scratch regions is able to percolate into the alluvial gorges...and who was in the pool |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jul 17 2006, 07:54 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guests |
I just noticed Emily's interpretation of some of the geology we're seeing. Interesting.
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Myran_* |
Jul 17 2006, 08:26 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guests |
For dvandorn and others looking for craters. There's one bona-fide crater in the right end of this radar image.
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2006, 05:13 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
I just noticed Emily's interpretation of some of the geology we're seeing. Interesting. Some of the terrain Emily finds difficult to interpret may resemble "The Fins', in Arches National monument. This was a sandstone sea bed that was pushed up and out from beneath. The fins cracked and spread, then were cross-cut by a river, with some dune formation on the edges. On the whole the terrain was incomprehensible, at first. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:42 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|