My Assistant
Ride On A Rocket, Price/Performace information about major LVs |
| Guest_DonPMitchell_* |
Jul 27 2006, 10:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The use of the Dnepr rockets lately got me wondering, just how much does it cost to launch stuff? We've talked about payload performance of rockets, but not cost and not reliability figures. I couldn't really find this information in one place, so I've spent an hour poking around on a variety of websites:
CODE Rocket LEO GTO Escape price kg/mega$ Launch:Fail ------ --- --- ------ ----- -------- ----------- Ariane 5 18,000 6,800 120 million 57 GTO 26:3 Atlas II 8,610 3,720 90 million 41 GTO 63:0 Atlas V 401 9,750 4,950 90 million 55 GTO 8:0 Atlas V HL 25,000 13,605 8,600 130 million 105 GTO Delta II 5,648 2,133 1,000 50 million 43 GTO 115:2 Delta IV M 9,106 4,231 70 million 60 GTO 5:0 Delta IV Heavy 21,892 12,757 140 million 91 GTO 1:0 Dnepr 1 4,500 12 million 375 LEO 39:6 Falcon 5 4,100 1,050 18 million 88 GTO 0:0 Falcon 9-S9 24,750 9,650 78 million 124 GTO 0:0 Kosmos 3M 1,500 12 million 125 LEO 434:20 Long March 3 4,800 1,400 37 million 38 GTO 13:2 Pegasus XL 440 14 million 31 LEO 11:1 Proton 21,000 5,645 6,220 100 million 56 GTO 238:18 Soyuz 7,400 2,000 1,200 35 million 57 GTO 1,691:101 Titan III 15,400 3,700 70 million 220 LEO 158:13 Titan IV 405 21,680 90 million 240 LEO 37:4 Tziklon 3 4,100 22 million 186 LEO 121:8 Zenit 2 13,740 60 million 229 LEO 37:6 Zenit 3SL 5,250 85 million 62 GTO 14:2 Some interesting things emerge from seeing all the numbers on one place. 1. The Dnepr is a cheap way to get something into orbit! 2. Launching geosynchronous satellites from the equator is a big win (Ariane, Falcon, Zenit SL). 3. The Falcons will be exciting if they do what they claim. 4. I see over 2000 Russian launches. Why am I missing so many US launches? 5. The R-7 ... wow. (I'm counting all R-7 launches, which is a little unfair, because most failures were very early) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 16 2006, 04:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 124 Joined: 23-March 06 Member No.: 723 |
The use of the Dnepr rockets lately got me wondering, just how much does it cost to launch stuff? We've talked about payload performance of rockets, but not cost and not reliability figures. I couldn't really find this information in one place, so I've spent an hour poking around on a variety of websites: CODE Rocket LEO GTO Escape price kg/mega$ Launch:Fail ------ --- --- ------ ----- -------- ----------- Ariane 5 18,000 6,800 120 million 57 GTO 26:3 Atlas II 8,610 3,720 90 million 41 GTO 63:0 Atlas V 401 9,750 4,950 90 million 55 GTO 8:0 Atlas V HL 25,000 13,605 8,600 130 million 105 GTO Delta II 5,648 2,133 1,000 50 million 43 GTO 115:2 Delta IV M 9,106 4,231 70 million 60 GTO 5:0 Delta IV Heavy 21,892 12,757 140 million 91 GTO 1:0 Dnepr 1 4,500 12 million 375 LEO 39:6 Falcon 5 4,100 1,050 18 million 88 GTO 0:0 Falcon 9-S9 24,750 9,650 78 million 124 GTO 0:0 Kosmos 3M 1,500 12 million 125 LEO 434:20 Long March 3 4,800 1,400 37 million 38 GTO 13:2 Pegasus XL 440 14 million 31 LEO 11:1 Proton 21,000 5,645 6,220 100 million 56 GTO 238:18 Soyuz 7,400 2,000 1,200 35 million 57 GTO 1,691:101 Titan III 15,400 3,700 70 million 220 LEO 158:13 Titan IV 405 21,680 90 million 240 LEO 37:4 Tziklon 3 4,100 22 million 186 LEO 121:8 Zenit 2 13,740 60 million 229 LEO 37:6 Zenit 3SL 5,250 85 million 62 GTO 14:2 Some interesting things emerge from seeing all the numbers on one place. 1. The Dnepr is a cheap way to get something into orbit! 2. Launching geosynchronous satellites from the equator is a big win (Ariane, Falcon, Zenit SL). 3. The Falcons will be exciting if they do what they claim. 4. I see over 2000 Russian launches. Why am I missing so many US launches? 5. The R-7 ... wow. (I'm counting all R-7 launches, which is a little unfair, because most failures were very early) The reason you're seeing so many Russian launches is because Plesetsk and Baikonur have been the most active launch pads in the world |
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 05:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The reason you're seeing so many Russian launches is because Plesetsk and Baikonur have been the most active launch pads in the world That's, um, sort of circular logic, isn't it? It's sort of like saying "The reason you see so many babies in this town is because this town has one of the busiest maternity wards in the world." Both sides of that equation reflect a result without recognizing a real cause. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 06:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 124 Joined: 23-March 06 Member No.: 723 |
That's, um, sort of circular logic, isn't it? Not really because it still depends on how good your pad and launcher are and how reliable a nation's launch service is with each pad - there are at least 7 other Russian and American pads I didn't mention, Wallops, 'Space-pork' Kodiak, US aircraft launches, SLC launcher, Kapustin yar, Svobodny and Russian sub launches. You could probably count all the launches from these 7 pads on both hands - while the Chinese Long March and the European Kourou would be far more active. Plesetsk and Baikonur have been built to launch the best rockets and none of the other Russian pads are able to launch a Soyuz. |
|
|
|
DonPMitchell Ride On A Rocket Jul 27 2006, 10:09 AM
ugordan Interesting stuff. I had the impression the Delta ... Jul 27 2006, 12:01 PM
djellison I'm not sure where you got some of the prices ... Jul 27 2006, 12:14 PM
hendric Don,
Be interesting to have a $/kg column a... Jul 27 2006, 04:28 PM
DonPMitchell Most of the prices are from Space And Tech, but so... Jul 27 2006, 05:17 PM
DonPMitchell I added a kilogram/dollar column.
The dnepr is th... Jul 27 2006, 10:01 PM
Jim from NSF.com US prices are too low. Can't say anymore Jul 28 2006, 02:09 AM

mchan I don't know if the US prices in Don's tab... Jul 28 2006, 05:00 AM
AndyG QUOTE (DonPMitchell @ Jul 27 2006, 11:01 ... Jul 28 2006, 09:15 AM
DonPMitchell Astronautix's prices are quite a bit different... Jul 28 2006, 05:02 AM
djellison QUOTE (DonPMitchell @ Jul 28 2006, 06:02 ... Jul 28 2006, 07:10 AM
dvandorn I'm sure there are factors in every launch veh... Jul 28 2006, 07:21 AM
mchan Delta and Atlas kept evolving with new configurati... Jul 28 2006, 09:40 AM
DonPMitchell The Proton is not inefficient. It takes enormous ... Jul 28 2006, 10:15 AM
mchan Outside of working for a launcher manufacturer and... Jul 28 2006, 10:35 AM
remcook talking of which...when will be the first soyuz la... Jul 28 2006, 10:34 AM
Rakhir QUOTE (remcook @ Jul 28 2006, 12:34 PM) t... Jul 28 2006, 11:16 AM
DonPMitchell What type of missions are planned to use the Soyuz... Jul 28 2006, 04:34 PM
DonPMitchell Another data point for the cost of an Atlas V, 401... Jul 29 2006, 05:17 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 05:36 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|