IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
McMurdo Pan, Please post new images here
Phil Stooke
post Oct 29 2006, 04:33 PM
Post #46


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Doug: "Polar....then for extra fun, a Phil-o-Polar"

Yikes - that's Phil on steroids! - or is is Viagra? And that pucker looks a little worrying. I would have compressed the foreground a bit before polaring to remove that!

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Oct 29 2006, 06:03 PM
Post #47





Guests






ElkGroveDan beat me on that comment.
The problem arises when you start to alter any part of one image, then you open the pandora box of speculation if anything you see in one image are real or if it have been altered in one way or other.

And I dont talk about changing the colour (or even colourisation) making a 360 degree panorama out of a set of images of course.

But as soon you move and copy a piece of rock or in this case sand, and present it as one actual image, then you really have gotten on loose sand. If theres something thats unwanted on the image it should simply have been cropped instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 29 2006, 06:15 PM
Post #48


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



All true But, we must admit they publish also all original images, both raw and pds... so you have the untouched material in your hands too!
Perhaps, for the purpose of a press release, these small changes are tolerable... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Oct 29 2006, 07:14 PM
Post #49


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



They DID get the full pan out for the 1000-sol anniversary. Big pans are prone to little stitching artifacts and such, especially in the near field.

Try getting the Endurance pan perfect as an exercise:rolleyes:

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 29 2006, 07:47 PM
Post #50


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Yes, but when you have a gore in the image, you have another issue. It is even more unrealistic to look at an image with a big blacked out gore in it (or even a little one, for that matter), or to have areas missing a color filter appear discolored.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 29 2006, 08:57 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2924
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Nix @ Oct 29 2006, 08:14 PM) *
Try getting the Endurance pan perfect as an exercise:rolleyes:
Nico

Nico, did you loose the Clickable Smilies?
Here is a rolleyes rolleyes.gif
biggrin.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 30 2006, 01:48 AM
Post #52


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4271
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



That faked section in the false colour McMurdo pan is certainly disappointing. They did a good job capturing the region in question on the natural colour pan, so it seems to me that they could've done a much better job of the false colour pan by matching the (false) colours as best as possible using whatever filters that didn't contain the shadow - heck, we've got all the filters here!

In other words, use whatever filter frames are available for the region in question. I'd say it's far less dubious to have some small region formed from different filters than the rest of the pan, and then colour matched as close as possible (this is false colour, after all!), than to paste in different topography!

In fact, I'm willing to bet that many an imaging wizard on this forum could do a very good job matching false colours with the real topography... wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Oct 30 2006, 05:02 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



It appears that they used part of the deck pan to patch the true color panrama. As the deck pan was done in L456 rather than the full filter set it was probably easier to use it to match the true color image. The false color image, which likely uses L257 to get the maximum color contrast may have been more difficult to match. Or the images used to patch the true color image may not been transmitted yet when the false color panorama was stitched together.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Oct 30 2006, 10:57 AM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2895
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Spirit is bored from making all the images at the Winter's Haven

and is now playing with her instruments. biggrin.gif

jvandriel
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 30 2006, 11:07 AM
Post #55


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



In order thats MI, MI pulled away, APXS, Mossbauer. Cunning use of conjuncton time - big fat integrations on the dust capture magnets.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Oct 30 2006, 11:39 AM
Post #56


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



"... but when you have a gore in the image,...."

A Gore?...

....Al?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Oct 30 2006, 01:59 PM
Post #57





Guests






jvandriel... nice Athena suite .gif image wheel.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Oct 30 2006, 02:03 PM
Post #58


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4280
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (jvandriel @ Oct 30 2006, 11:57 AM) *
Spirit is bored from making all the images at the Winter's Haven and is now playing with her instruments. biggrin.gif


Uh, oh. There must be something related to this "issue". laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jul 15 2007, 01:48 AM
Post #59


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Pancam site has v2 of the McMurdo pan posted, with Spirit now included.

http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_...mcmurdo_v2.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:23 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.