IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A double use telescope, a post-Hubble idea
dilo
post Aug 4 2006, 10:15 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Well, I obviously hope that Hubble will be repaired/updated and will last as much as possible.
But, sometime, we will need a replacement.
The James Webb telescope will mainly work in the mid-infrared region so I would like to have also something working in the visible and UV wavelenghts in order to guarantee a continuity (in the near IR, the fast Adaptive Optics progress will soon permit to have space-like performances from Earth).
Consider also that recent Earth-observing satellites are equipped with true telescopes, with very interesting performances; see Ikonos images of Mars during opposition:
http://www.spaceimaging.com/gallery/mars/default.htm

So my "crazy" idea is to make a telescope smaller than Hubble (let say 1.2m diameter) but equipped with state-of-the-art sensors and, especially, with heliosyncronous orbit at 800Km height.
The great advantage will be that, while orbiting above illuminated Earth side, this telescope can be used for remote sensing with a stunning resolution close to 30cm/pixel (like MRO!) while in the night side will take astronomical images and spectra.
Such compact telescope should have a moderate cost and, anyway, it's commercial use could cover the initial investment!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Jeff7
post Aug 4 2006, 11:25 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



I seem to recall hearing somewhere that it'd be cheaper to build a new Hubble and launch it with a conventional rocket rather than paying for servicing and a shuttle launch.
The design process for Hubble is done already, so building another one from existing blueprints would be fairly cheap to do. That, and it could be launched with the various enhancements that have already gone into the orbiting one - no need for complicated space-based upgrades.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Aug 4 2006, 03:25 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Jeff7, probably you're talking of the Hubble Origins Probe (HOP), a 2.4m orbital telescope proposed by an international team led by Johns Hopkins University astronomers.
Idea is good, even though a half size instrument would probably cost less, considering also launch cost... but for sure also less performing! wink.gif

If we have to make a "Hubble2", I have another idea to improve it:
an extendible sunshield, easy to implement and very useful especially for studing internal planets and comets at perihelion (now hard or impossible to see with Hubble). On a wide field telescope this would allow to discover also many NEO object having most of their orbit inside Earth one. Look to these rough draws:
Attached Image

2nd solution is more efficient but require precise pointing respect to the sun (more risk!)


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 4 2007, 08:06 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Who is interested can read my preliminary assessment on such idea:
Attached File  SET.doc ( 129.5K ) Number of downloads: 1171

Suggestions and critics are welcome!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:51 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.