IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NEO number, how many dangerous objects?
dilo
post Aug 5 2006, 10:47 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Looking to last discovery statistics data, there was a dramatic decrease of new big NEA discovery rate in the last 6 months (they almost halved). Even more impressive, the number of big PHA (objects really close Earth orbit) remained stable in the last 7 months, while increased at average rate of 1 per month previously.
This is not unexpected, the search for these object has seriously started 8 years ago and the goal was to catch 90% of total population within 10 years. The fact that, in spite of the ever increasing search effort, discovery rate reached maximum in 2002 and now is decreasing suggests that census is nearing the saturation.
I made a very simplified attempt to estimate the total number of these objects based on actual discovery trend,modeling the cumulative curves of PHA/NEA greater than 1Km for the last years:
Attached Image

The interpolated curves are typical saturation trends in the form: N=A(1-exp(-(time- B)/C)) where C is a time constant resulting equal to 3 years in both curves. The constant A tell us the total population number, and the reported curves correspond to 945 NEA and 183 PHA.
If true, this means that we already discovered 87% and 89% of total PHA/NEA populations, respectively!
Obviously, the search will continue on the ever increasing population of smaller objects, not a threat for the planet but for local heavy damage...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 11 2007, 09:21 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Time to update.
There was a substantial change in the number of dangerous asteroids reported in the NASA NEO page (-18%) due to revised size:
"The Until relatively recently, the mean albedo for NEAs was thought to be 0.11 so the corresponding absolute magnitude for a NEA whose effective diameter is one kilometer was thought to be H = 18.0.
[...]
Recent work by Stuart (2003) and others have shown that NEAs are, in the mean, 20% brighter than previously thought so that the mean albedo for NEAs is 0.14 rather than 0.11. Using this revised mean albedo implies the absolute magnitude (H) for a NEA with an effective one kilometer diameter is 17.75."

This brought to a revised estimation with criteria disussed above: the total number of NEA>1Km should become close to 776 and PHA are 150 or slightly below...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 11 2007, 09:25 PM
Post #3


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Huh. Good catch on that update, Dilo.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 08:00 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.