IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Deimos!, MGS MOC Release No. MOC2-1551, 11 August 2006
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Aug 11 2006, 04:15 PM
Post #1





Guests






It looks as if Mike and Phil's efforts have paid off biggrin.gif

Deimos!
MGS MOC Release No. MOC2-1551, 11 August 2006

EDIT: Sorry, Phil, I didn't read all the way to the bottom of the release.

This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Aug 11 2006, 05:02 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Myran_*
post Aug 11 2006, 04:53 PM
Post #2





Guests






Phil Stooke also get a mentioning on that page, small world(s). smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Aug 11 2006, 05:13 PM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Glad to see MOC has now imaged all the members of the "Mars system." smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Aug 11 2006, 05:29 PM
Post #4





Guests






QUOTE (tedstryk @ Aug 11 2006, 07:13 AM) *
Glad to see MOC has now imaged all the members of the "Mars system." smile.gif

Mike can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the Mars Observer Camera (i.e., MOC1) would have returned even more spectacular views of both martian moons, primarily due to the nature of the descent from elliptical capture orbit to final mapping orbit.

Off topic: Ted, is your signature purposely coded the way it appears?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Aug 12 2006, 02:09 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2559
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Aug 11 2006, 10:29 AM) *
Mike can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the Mars Observer Camera (i.e., MOC1) would have returned even more spectacular views of both martian moons, primarily due to the nature of the descent from elliptical capture orbit to final mapping orbit.

This might have been true for Phobos, where there was some effort planned to make the "1-day drift orbit" period be an integer multiple of the period of Phobos and so produce a close approach on each orbit. I don't think the Deimos geometry would have been much improved, though.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:37 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.