My Assistant
Halfpipe Formation |
Aug 12 2006, 05:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
A brief discussion on this began on the Route thread after Pando posted an interesting route map. Pando's image is attached to a lower resolution version below that extends the coverage up to Erebus Crater. What caught the eye of a few people were the areas labeled as the "Halfpipe Formation", coloured yellow below. This unit would seem to represent a new statigraphic horizon that overlies the Burns Formation.
![]() Medium size 915K Large size 1.9Mb I went back to images of the Payson outcrop from sol 748-50, where the name Halfpipe first appeared. There was mention of a Mogollon Contact. I wonder if the contact could correspond to the rough textured, darker zone running diagonally in the central part of this photo. It seems similar to the Whatanga Contact between the Middle and Upper units of the Burns Formation. The Whatanga contact is interpreted to be a zone of recrystallization created above the water table. And I don't know if this was mentioned before, but there seems to be a lot of evidence for cross-bedding (festoon geometry?) and possible soft-sediment deformation at Payson lying below the possible contact. Could this be the equivalent of the Burns Upper Unit? The other location where the Halfpipe Formation was observed was on sol 818 at our "Sinkhole Crater". http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...VMP2410L5M1.JPG But what about the other Halfpipe location on Pando's image, off the route map to the east? On what basis would NASA have those outcrops to be similar to those at Sinkhole and Payson? -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 24 2006, 08:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
I think you've got it. Whereas the current "soil" is a basalt sand-blueberry composition, the Halfpipe Fm is a paleosoil composed of subangular basaltic cobbles and other components. It is widespread and in that earlier era was the equivalent to the drifts we see on Meridiani today. Perhaps not a 'soil', strictly, but a surface unit more weathered than a regolith. It is different from the current soil because the environmental conditions were different in that earlier time. Nothing astounding: in the terrestrial Sahara desert we can find evidence of earlier, wetter, more temperate conditions under all the sand dunes currently present.
The "Stump", that disintegrating boulder we looked at from Overgaard, is likely connected with Halfpipe, and should have been examined while Oppy was there. Along with several other areas along the way to Victoria. This is not so much 20/20 hindsight as there were folks here saying "Stop. Look!". I'm not finger-pointing, but simply relaying observations. Hopefully, we'll make a stop at the "Epsilon" crater ahead and look at the ejecta unit and the underlying units before heading on to Victoria. And perhaps we'll be able to see the same sequence once we get to Victoria, if there is not too much disruption. Exciting times, no? --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
aldo12xu Halfpipe Formation Aug 12 2006, 05:17 PM
Bill Harris We're thinking along the same lines. If we... Aug 12 2006, 07:17 PM
CosmicRocker aldo12xu: Thanks for starting a new topic, since ... Aug 13 2006, 07:01 AM
Bill Harris Tom--
As much as I'm hoping that Whatanga is ... Aug 13 2006, 11:21 AM
Bill Harris Oppy appears to be moving Southeast, away from Bea... Aug 13 2006, 11:50 AM
aldo12xu I was also surprised that they didn't RAT a po... Aug 13 2006, 04:18 PM
CosmicRocker I think I've read about those hematite concret... Aug 14 2006, 05:24 AM
Bill Harris I've long felt that the changes we noticed in ... Aug 14 2006, 10:31 AM
CosmicRocker I'm glad I went back and checked that terrestr... Aug 15 2006, 05:33 AM
Bill Harris And where would the location for the source of the... Aug 15 2006, 08:33 AM
CosmicRocker I wish I knew. I guess I didn't make it clear... Aug 15 2006, 08:23 PM
tim53 The name "halfpipe" was first used, by J... Aug 15 2006, 11:40 PM
tdemko Tim:
Do you think the "Halfpipe Formation... Aug 16 2006, 01:15 AM
Bill Harris Fooey, Tim, you had us going for a while. I'm... Aug 16 2006, 01:20 AM
CosmicRocker At this point, I am stepping back to digest the ne... Aug 16 2006, 05:37 AM
tim53 tdemko:
Something like that, perhaps. I have my ... Aug 16 2006, 01:58 PM
aldo12xu Thanks for clarrifying things, Tim. No more heads... Aug 16 2006, 02:50 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE The current Meridiani landscape surface is ... Aug 17 2006, 06:08 PM
CosmicRocker Well, that clarifies that the Halfpipe formation w... Aug 18 2006, 07:25 AM
Bill Harris Ah, time for long-winded geologizing. I like that... Aug 18 2006, 09:26 AM
tdemko Bill:
The bare patches of evaporite, and the erod... Aug 20 2006, 01:50 PM
Bill Harris Good points. I guess it's the "half-full... Aug 21 2006, 02:00 AM
CosmicRocker tdemko: Would you mind commenting further regardi... Aug 21 2006, 05:43 AM
tdemko Tom:
I think we are thinking the same here. The b... Aug 21 2006, 04:33 PM
tim53 QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Aug 20 2006, 10:43 ... Aug 21 2006, 10:13 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE Are you hypothesizing that previously eroded... Aug 21 2006, 09:54 AM
CosmicRocker Thanks for your replies, guys. I was concerned I ... Aug 22 2006, 05:29 AM
Bill Harris CR, from the "Annulus" thread:
QUOTE Whe... Aug 22 2006, 07:15 AM
aldo12xu When I first saw those images, I thought Explorito... Aug 22 2006, 04:25 PM
Bill Harris Attached is a Route Map for Sol 742, which covers ... Aug 22 2006, 06:05 PM
CosmicRocker Bill: I don't know if I am way out in left fi... Aug 24 2006, 05:06 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 12:58 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|