China to the Moon - Chang'e program, Chinese unmanned lunar mission |
![]() ![]() |
China to the Moon - Chang'e program, Chinese unmanned lunar mission |
Jun 28 2012, 07:41 AM
Post
#226
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
at last the story has been picked up by Chinese news sites!
http://tech.sina.com.cn/d/2012-06-27/14427317706.shtml nothing new as far as I can tell from the Google translation, beside the first mention of a planned flyby distance of 1000 km. I also find it interesting that they mention a flyby near the end of this year or early next year, as if the date was not yet fixed -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2012, 07:40 PM
Post
#227
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
still nothing new on CE-2 to Toutatis, so I was performing some calculation.
I found the specs of the camera in the paper Overall scheme and on-orbit images of Chang'E-2 lunar satellite CCD stereo camera. It is quite different from the camera on CE-1. It consists of a refracting optics mated to two 6144 pixel linear arrays: a forward looking and a rearward looking one. at a distance of 1,000 km from Toutatis, each picture will be 430 km wide and will have a resolution of 70 m per pixel. Unfortunately, the linear array camera is well suited for an orbiter, but not for a flyby probe. either CE-2 will have to rock back and forth to build images, or it will have to collect long swaths as the asteroid crosses the field of view. Moreover, it is not particularly suitable for optical navigation. In any case, I would not expect more than a handful of pics. Data return should be slow but not painfully so. At L2 CE-2 returned data at 750 kilobits per second, and some 20 times more distant at Toutatis it should return at several kilobits per second, comparable to Stardust. -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2012, 07:55 PM
Post
#228
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
I am puzzled... Chinese news sites are now reporting a Toutatis flyby in March next year instead of January!
see for ex http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-07-25/021924837262.shtml -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2012, 08:17 PM
Post
#229
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
That must be wrong - Toutatis will be very far away by then. I would guess a reporter misunderstanding. I am assuming the spacecraft will remain in the vicinity of Earth and probably return to the Earth-Moon system later, though no idea yet what its fate will be.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Jul 25 2012, 04:39 PM
Post
#230
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
-------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Jul 25 2012, 11:15 PM
Post
#231
|
||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
The landing area shown in that abstract is plotted here as a red box on a Quickmap background:
So not necessarily literally in Sinus Iridum, it may be outside but nearby. I don't know of other areas with the very high resolution coverage, so Chang'E 4 may be targeted for the same region, and maybe even the later sample return missions. Still quite a lot of scope for different sites and surface compositions here. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
||
Jul 29 2012, 10:47 PM
Post
#232
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
That must be wrong - Toutatis will be very far away by then. I would guess a reporter misunderstanding. I am assuming the spacecraft will remain in the vicinity of Earth and probably return to the Earth-Moon system later, though no idea yet what its fate will be. Phil Hopefully adding some confidence to the details of the encounter: The event is mentioned in the Goldstone radar's schedule: http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/Toutati...2_planning.html It must be on then.. Regards to All, Tolis. |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2012, 04:51 AM
Post
#233
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
actually, I wrote an email to the guy who maintains the JPL asteroid radar site last month and he told me that he has no first-hand info. all he knows about the flyby is what can be learned from Emily's blog
-------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2012, 01:53 PM
Post
#234
|
|
![]() Bloggette par Excellence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3959 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
OK, that's funny. The Wikipedia effect at work.
I have spoken with American scientists working with the Chinese on this flyby, so it is for real, but I have no more details than I did before. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 02:55 AM
Post
#235
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 12 |
PanSTARRS observations of Chang'e suggest it will be at Toutatis by December.
http://www.projectpluto.com/pluto/mpecs/cheprobe.htm |
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 09:34 AM
Post
#236
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
PanSTARRS observations of Chang'e suggest it will be at Toutatis by December. thanks! solid info at (long) last! -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 11:43 AM
Post
#237
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
the Project Pluto page has been updated:
QUOTE You can fit an orbit to the current (as of 18 August) observations and get a positional match, at 08:27 UT on 13 December, within better than an arcminute, with a close match in distance as well. Toutatis comes to its closest approach to earth (0.046 AU) on the preceding day. meanwhile I have received an email from a Chinese engineer working on orbit design for CE-2. although he did not give me the precise date, nor the targeted flyby distance, he told me that the encounter is expected to take place 7 million kilometers (0.0468 AU) from Earth, which closely fits the 13 December date. Some more details on orbital design: CE-2 entered solar orbit directly from L2, without any Moon or Earth flybys, with a delta-v of several m/s. At the end of the L2 "excursion", the remaining delta-v was about 120 m/s. Four course corrections will precisely target the Toutatis flyby and establish a geometry that's convenient for imaging and communications. The relative speed at closest approach will be about 11 km/s. -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 02:55 PM
Post
#238
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2560 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 02:57 PM
Post
#239
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
We should probably move this section of the thread to a dedicated asteroid section.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 03:13 PM
Post
#240
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
-------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 10:54 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|