My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
First pictures, when and where? |
Oct 18 2006, 01:26 AM
Post
#286
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 475 |
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Edward Schmitz_* |
Oct 18 2006, 02:01 AM
Post
#287
|
|
Guests |
This is the color swath that was taken at the same time.
http://hiroc.lpl.arizona.edu/images/TRA/TR...1410/color.html It would appear that the darker areas are frost free and not necessarily wet. Although they might be. Probably not though. |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 06:16 AM
Post
#288
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
It would appear that the darker areas are frost free and not necessarily wet. Although they might be. Probably not though. Thanks for clearing that up... -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 07:23 AM
Post
#289
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 475 |
Maybe not wet but maybe rich in salts from past weeps and as such acting like an anti-icing agent for the frost. So maybe just a clue that at some time in the past those darker areas were where salt rich water weeps actually occured.
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 07:59 AM
Post
#290
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Could anybody explain the reason for those discontinuities between the "strips" which make a HiRISE image?
See, for instance, the image from Terra Sirenium Crater as posted by prometeus. I could understand that effect if each strip was related to an individual pass but I'm pretty sure that's not the case. I would say each strip is related to one of the 10 CCDs making the whole sensor but why those gaps? |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 09:48 AM
Post
#291
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Data is progressively transferred off the CCD chips as the electrons are bucket-brigade transfered across individual pixels in the chips' fields of view and track the moving planetary surface across the chip. I think we're seeing the data transfer off chips as a data-take ends, but I don't have a clear idea why it causes the sawtooth effect.
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 09:50 AM
Post
#292
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Distortion induced by off nadir imaging?
Doug |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 10:29 AM
Post
#293
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
Since Tuvas said on the HiBlog (stage 12) that they geometrically reproject the images so that the result is an image that distances can be read from I suspect that this is an artifact of a sunusoidal equidistant map projection.
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:31 PM
Post
#294
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
> I suspect that this is an artifact of a sunusoidal equidistant map projection.
I thought about something related to the map projection too, but look that we are talking about images which cover a quite small space (e.g. Terra Sirenium Crater's picture covers only 5km x 5km). We shouldn't have projection artifacts on this map scale. |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:54 PM
Post
#295
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10253 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Tesheiner's right - over such a small area map projection effects are insignificant. Helvick's idea could apply for images spanning several tens of degrees (individual strips made from Map-a-Planet images in sinusoidal projection and fitted together) - but that's clearly not the case here.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 01:16 PM
Post
#296
|
||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Ok, here is what I've got by overlaping part of the huge B&W VC image (TRA_000873_1780_RED) on top of the same region of it's color version (TRA_000873_1780_RGBcolor). Remember that the first *is* map projected while the second isn't; I had to rescale and rotate the color part to match with the map-projected overlay.
What we see is that the sawtooth gaps are not distortions but actually missing data. It seems this data may have been lost during the map-projection process because it is actually there on the RGB version. |
|
|
|
||
Oct 18 2006, 06:25 PM
Post
#297
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 428 Joined: 21-August 06 From: Northern Virginia Member No.: 1062 |
Tesheiner's right - over such a small area map projection effects are insignificant. Helvick's idea could apply for images spanning several tens of degrees (individual strips made from Map-a-Planet images in sinusoidal projection and fitted together) - but that's clearly not the case here. Phil I don't fully understand the sawtooth affect myself, but I can tell you it's introduced in the Geometrically projected image stage. As to what's causing it, well, your guess is as good as mine... |
|
|
|
Oct 19 2006, 06:53 AM
Post
#298
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
A bug in the code?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 19 2006, 08:39 AM
Post
#299
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8789 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Almost looks as if it's a spherical projection artifact, but the scale's so small...
Wait a minute...just thinking out loud, here, but is the HIRISE FOV so small that spherical distortion does in fact take place at the edges of frames? If, so, then the sawtooth effect might be an attempt to correct this distortion. BTW, if that is in fact wet soil, then I propose a future lander with a garden shovel to dig for worms! -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2006, 08:51 AM
Post
#300
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
but is the HIRISE FOV so small that spherical distortion does in fact take place at the edges of frames? On the contrary, the very small FOV means the curvature of the surface at that scale is so small it can effectively be regarded as flat. Just as Phil said, you need several degrees wide footprints to end up with significant map projection distortions. The sawtooth appears to occur only in the upper part of the swaths which is also inconsistent with map projections. -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th October 2024 - 11:51 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|