My Assistant
T18 (September 23, 2006) |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 18 2006, 10:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The mission description document is now online (1.03 Mb PDF).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 19 2006, 08:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Is there any GOOD reason....
The perpetual sub-competence of government P.I.O. offices is not a good reason... for the mission description documents to only cover the titan flybys?.... Every periapsis pass there are other interesting observation sequences, non-targeted moon encounters, etc. Why do they <BLEEP> only press-release a Titan Encounter ONLY document, instead of an "Orbit 18 Titan and Periapsis Observations" document? |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 01:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 4-March 06 Member No.: 694 |
I get annoyed by the same problem too.
I would dearly like each "Revolution" document to state ALL icy moon and Saturn relating imaging and observations. I have to use the Solar System Simulator to find out all this infomation. And it is time consuming! -------------------- I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed.
- Opening line from episode 13 of "Cosmos" |
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Sep 19 2006, 02:02 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 02:20 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 13-October 05 Member No.: 528 |
For that matter, how much new, or particularly specific, information even on the Titan flyby is in typically in there?
As I recall, last time we had to dig and dig to find any reference at all to the Radar pass. I think I finally found a reference to it in the data playback schedule. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 03:37 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
I think part of it is that the only targeted flybys between 2006 and halfway 2007 only involve Titan. There are no other targeted moon flybys.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 11:02 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1279 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
OOOOO nice radar observation! Crosses other sars strips!
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2006, 05:17 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
If it makes you feel any better, there really isn't any icy sat observations this orbit, except for a half-decent observation of Janus, IIRC.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 03:50 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 550 |
Where was the sar coverage during this flyby?
I know there is going to be more north polar sar covergae but I thought that was the next flyby, T19.... I remember somebody once posted a Titan mosaic showing all the planned sar swaths, and they were outlined in yellow if I remember correctly, not that the yellow outline colour is particularly important, but I can't find it anywhere now! |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 03:59 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I remember somebody once posted a Titan mosaic showing all the planned sar swaths, and they were outlined in yellow if I remember correctly, not that the yellow outline colour is particularly important, but I can't find it anywhere now! That would be Joe Knapp a.k.a. jmknapp. It's an old post, perhaps a year or so, look it up in the old posts. Note the map only shows reference passes, the RADAR team can turn the spacecraft in the other look direction, i.e. left-right so a different area is mapped. In fact, they might have done just that with this flyby. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 04:04 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
IIRC, it is another ride-along pass for RADAR, so T18's swath was not as long as say T16 or T8, for example. This pass covered a swath located between the Ta and T16 SAR passes, reach as far north as 70-75 N near 40 W longitude. Like Ta and T16, it then curves south, down to around 30N, 350 W. This is just going from memory, so I may be a bit off, but it lies basically between Ta and T16.
T19 is a prime coverage swath covering terrain basically parallel to T16. The mid point of the swath is a bit north of T16, around 85-86 N. The swath then crosses the T16 swath on to the east and west of that mid-point, halfway out to the ends. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 04:27 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1279 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
QUOTE I remember somebody once posted a Titan mosaic showing all the planned sar swaths, and they were outlined in yellow if I remember correctly, not that the yellow outline colour is particularly important, but I can't find it anywhere now! Here ya go Matt! http://cassinicam.com/titanflybys/ At the bottom. |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 26 2006, 07:19 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 07:22 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Also, see PIA08741: Shorefront Property, Anyone?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 08:24 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
These two lakes appear to share the same basin. You can see the bottom margin quite clearly, though the northern one is a little more obscure. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 08:40 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 550 |
Thankyou for the info people, this site is top notch for that.
Oh yeah and the new Sar images aren't bad either! What a nice suprise, was not necessarily expecting this. |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 11:16 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 04:02 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 10-December 05 Member No.: 605 |
Just wondering (not sure if this is a stupid question), has Cassini seen any specular reflections from the lakes yet, and if not, when might it be in a position to do so? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 04:49 AM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Just wondering (not sure if this is a stupid question), has Cassini seen any specular reflections from the lakes yet, and if not, when might it be in a position to do so? Thanks! No specular reflection thus far. The lakes RADAR has seen are currently in polar night, and are probably too far north for ISS or VIMS to ever see a specular reflection, but you never know in an extended-extended mission. RADAR SAR won't see a specular reflection from these lakes because of the non-nadir pointing in that mode. You could see a specular reflection when RADAR is in altimetry mode since that the antenna is nadir pointed in that mode, but that would require RADAR to sacrifice a polar SAR swath -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 08:48 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
my god, it's full of lakes! This fits with the recently discovered ethane clouds, which covers all longitudes in the north.
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 11:14 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
my god, it's full of lakes! Have you seen more of the swath than the two bits in the press releases posted above? This is all very exciting and I'm getting used to press releases claiming certainty for these observations of lakes. I have no reason to doubt the experts, but I will be much happier when the evidence for standing liquids becomes incontrovertible. What would that take, I wonder? |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 11:44 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
No, I haven't seen any more of it, but of the two times we had a look at the north we've seen lake-like things. And more than one as well! I'm also not convinced they are actually lakes, but I was just expressing my enthusiasm over these exciting finds. But I think lakes are certainly not unexpected from what we now learned about clouds from Cassini.
Specular reflections would be nice... |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 12:09 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Specular reflections would be nice... The problem is those high latitudes are pretty much in darkness right now. By the time they start receiving enough sunlight in a few years, they might be all gone. It's kind of like the light inside the fridge -- you know it goes out when you shut the door, but you can never actually see that. In cartoons anyway. The best case we might get is seeing Ontario Lacus' specular point close to the end of nominal mission (was it T38?). That's a south polar "lake" however. The flyby geometry would need to be just right as well for the northern passes - a nontrivial constraint. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 12:26 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
radar doesn't have that problem
edit: in fact - " The echo appears consistent with reflection from localized hydrocarbon liquid regions embedded in mostly nonspecularly reflecting terrain." from: "Cassini First Radio Science Observations of Titan's Atmosphere and Surface" , Marouf et al., DPS 2006 presentation 36.02I though that's not the polar lakes I believe. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 12:36 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
If one wanted to design an instrument specifically for remotely detecting liquids per se, what would it consist of? Are specular reflections really the best hope? I wonder why is it so difficult to make such an obvious and fundamental observation?
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 03:18 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
The problem is those high latitudes are pretty much in darkness right now. By the time they start receiving enough sunlight in a few years, they might be all gone. It's kind of like the light inside the fridge -- you know it goes out when you shut the door, but you can never actually see that. In cartoons anyway. The best case we might get is seeing Ontario Lacus' specular point close to the end of nominal mission (was it T38?). That's a south polar "lake" however. The flyby geometry would need to be just right as well for the northern passes - a nontrivial constraint. That's assuming of course that these lakes fill up in winter. However, given that the size of these lakes and the regular cloud activity at the southern pole, these probably fill up in the summer. We see plenty of dark, little spots in the south polar region, and not just Ontario Lacus, that are probably lakes. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 04:19 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 04:58 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
winter is between solstice and equinox, like on Earth.
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 05:00 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 4-March 06 Member No.: 694 |
Slightly OT question but I'm curious - what exactly is the definition of winter and summer on Titan? Titan orbits Saturn. But Saturn, like the earth is tilted in it's orbit. So over a Saturn year (29.46 Earth years), Saturn will be sunlit over a "Saturn year" just like the Earth does in a "Earth Year". ie One pole is in darkness while the other one is in contstant sunlight. Titan is tilted about 1 degree to Saturn's equator so Titan also expriences seasons as well. At the moment, Titan's south pole is in constant sunlight while the moon's north pole is in darkness. We call the south pole in constant sunlight "Summer" and "Winter" at the darkened north pole. Also, allmost all of Saturn's regular moons (ie Mimas, Tethys, etc) are in the same position to. Only Iapetus and possibily Hyperion are in a position now to have both poles in sunlight. However, in August 2009 the subsolar latitude of Saturn will be at zero degrees. So both poles of Saturn (and most of it's moons) will be sunlit. After that, the north pole will be more and more sunlit (Summer) and more and more of the south pole will go into darkness (Winter) until the next solstice in 2017 where Saturn's subsolar latitude will be at the highest northerly latitude. The south pole will be in darkness. It is hoped the Cassini misson is extended to allow observations after July 2008. -------------------- I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed.
- Opening line from episode 13 of "Cosmos" |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 29 2006, 12:42 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Guests |
Dave Seal's glog entry for today is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 21 2007, 12:52 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 04:02 AM
Post
#32
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 04:17 AM
Post
#33
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Could be. Would make sense, if these are caldera lakes, then tectonic fractures could have acted as conduits of cryomagma to the surface (like on Io). If these are sink holes, then the weakened crust around these fractures could have focused the locations of these lakes.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 09:46 AM
Post
#34
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 8-November 05 From: Australia Member No.: 547 |
Is it just me or does this SAR pass appear coarser than previous scans? Compared to the T16 pass, this one shows much greater granulation.
Could this just be an artifact of the data processing, or was the T18 pass simply a less favourable encounter? |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 09:57 AM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
It's all about the flyby distance and the map scale these images are reprojected onto. T18 was probably just farther away so the resolution is coarser.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 04:14 PM
Post
#36
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
T18 was actually one of the closest flybys at 960 km but the RADAR observation was riding along with INMS, which was controlling the pointing. I'm not sure why that would decrease the resolution though -- was RADAR being pointed at a larger look angle than it prefers?
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:12 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|