My Assistant
Lunar MER?, What could a mission like this do? |
Sep 19 2006, 02:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
As plans to explore the Moon move forward, I wondered about the possible success of MER-like rovers sent to the Moon. There are a number of contrasts with Mars:
The same "drive train", in half of martian gravity, could easily carry a much larger set of instruments. Communications would be almost instantaneous. Rovers on the lunar near-side would ALWAYS be in radio contact with Earth. No relays necessary. The lunar sol is 14 days. Combine those last three points, and you could imagine HUGE (by MER standards) drives performed in a single sol. Or a large number of IDD explorations in a modest-sized area. The rover would have to survive a lunar night. Some of the mass advantage could be put into heaters. (Apparently) no issue with dust covering the solar panels. No seasons. No winter. Twice the solar power, all things being equal. MER fans ought to drool. Downside, of course: the Moon may not be as interesting for you as Mars. But there's still plenty there to study. Operations wise, imagine two "packs" of rovers (a pack could be as small as one rover) sent to different latitudes but the same longitude. Send one pack to someplace near the eastern limb and somewhere near the western limb, so that the fraction of the time that one pack would be in in daylight would approach unity. Have three or four teams on Earth that operate 8 hour shifts to keep each rover in constant action throughout the lunar day. When night falls on one pack, it would not be long until the other pack experienced dawn. Without the delta-v requirements of interplanetary cruise, it should easily best the cost of MERs. For the launch cost of a New Frontiers mission, two pairs of rovers could be launched to support this kind of exploration, and could last seemingly indefinitely. Four sites with very long drives at each could explore a great variety of the lunar service. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 19 2006, 03:02 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
To be honest - while the idea is quite romantic - there's probably little you would end up feeding forward from the MER design into a lunar rover. The requirements are quite different - particularly thermally I'd have thought. You would want realtime video requiring serious bandwidth etc etc. Perhaps the mobility system could be used - but not much else I wouldn't have thought. I seem to remember this debate already happenign though
Doug |
|
|
|
JRehling Lunar MER? Sep 19 2006, 02:54 PM
helvick I tend to agree with Doug here. While a MER type r... Sep 19 2006, 04:18 PM
Stephen QUOTE (helvick @ Sep 19 2006, 04:18 PM) I... Sep 20 2006, 02:13 AM
AndyG QUOTE (helvick @ Sep 19 2006, 05:18 PM) D... Sep 20 2006, 03:38 PM
dvandorn Honestly, as much as I would *really* love to see ... Sep 19 2006, 06:58 PM
tedstryk QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 19 2006, 06:58 PM) ... Sep 19 2006, 08:25 PM
JRehling QUOTE (tedstryk @ Sep 19 2006, 01:25 PM) ... Sep 19 2006, 08:41 PM
Phil Stooke I strongly agree with dvandorn that a series of sm... Sep 19 2006, 08:13 PM
RNeuhaus Thinking to send a rover to Moon. I only see a pur... Sep 19 2006, 08:54 PM
Phil Stooke The Surveyors descended most of the way to the sur... Sep 20 2006, 01:23 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 20 2006, 08:23 A... Sep 20 2006, 07:50 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 20 2006, 12:50 PM) ... Sep 20 2006, 09:05 PM
Phil Stooke I thought, from the pictures I'd seen, that it... Sep 20 2006, 10:56 PM
Jim from NSF.com Those versions of the Star-37 are longer and heavi... Sep 20 2006, 11:39 PM
DonPMitchell I think NASA would learn a lot by sending rovers t... Sep 21 2006, 12:31 PM
Phil Stooke I thought it was the other way round, Don - the Lu... Sep 21 2006, 12:51 PM
gndonald QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 21 2006, 08:51 P... Sep 21 2006, 02:45 PM

Stephen QUOTE (gndonald @ Sep 21 2006, 02:45 PM) ... Sep 22 2006, 05:29 AM

gndonald QUOTE (Stephen @ Sep 22 2006, 01:29 PM) L... Sep 22 2006, 02:37 PM
DonPMitchell Of course, Lunokhod didn't have an especially ... Sep 22 2006, 06:53 PM
edstrick As I've commented before, one of the most valu... Sep 23 2006, 10:31 AM
DDAVIS A rover, traversing several hundred km of selected... Sep 25 2006, 03:14 AM
Stephen QUOTE (DDAVIS @ Sep 25 2006, 03:14 AM) I ... Sep 25 2006, 06:54 AM
edstrick The new National Academy of Sciences report (NASA... Sep 25 2006, 09:30 AM
Lunar Optimist Why do we need an unmanned lunar rovers? It's... Oct 23 2006, 01:48 AM
djellison QUOTE (Lunar Optimist @ Oct 23 2006, 02:4... Oct 23 2006, 07:40 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 22 2006, 11:40 PM)... Oct 23 2006, 03:10 PM
RNeuhaus The idea to send rovers to make a good base and ho... Oct 23 2006, 02:55 AM
climber QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Oct 23 2006, 04:55 AM) ... Oct 23 2006, 08:39 AM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (climber @ Oct 23 2006, 03:39 AM) D... Oct 23 2006, 02:33 PM
Greg Hullender I'm afraid I quit reading after "Tritium ... Oct 23 2006, 04:12 AM
Phil Stooke The idea of using wenches to move the lander is ce... Oct 23 2006, 12:26 PM
paxdan Hmm i'd sign up for that technical position
... Oct 23 2006, 12:45 PM
djellison And those solar panels would have to rotates 360 d... Oct 23 2006, 02:47 PM
djellison I can't imagine why you would land with unbrak... Oct 23 2006, 03:33 PM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 23 2006, 07:33 AM)... Oct 23 2006, 03:42 PM
helvick QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 23 2006, 04:33 PM)... Oct 23 2006, 04:13 PM
Lunar Optimist Yes, you're right, it was a long post, but som... Oct 23 2006, 05:45 PM
paxdan QUOTE (Lunar Optimist @ Oct 23 2006, 06:4... Oct 24 2006, 06:50 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:35 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|