IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Final Approach, First good views of Victoria
Stu
post Sep 19 2006, 04:03 PM
Post #1


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Well, what does everyone think of our long-awaited first view..?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
48 Pages V  « < 12 13 14 15 16 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (195 - 209)
djellison
post Sep 21 2006, 03:56 PM
Post #196


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Look at the MOC DEM movie - the duck bay slope looks NASTY - I would estimate as much as twice as steep as some of the slopes on the South and South Eastern edge of the crater.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 21 2006, 03:58 PM
Post #197


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



No colour views yet, so here's another bit of fun...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Sep 21 2006, 04:01 PM
Post #198


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Wouldn't the steepest slopes be where the distance to the dunefield is minimal? As seen in the orbital images the dunefield is not smack in the middle.

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 21 2006, 04:07 PM
Post #199


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4280
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (MahFL @ Sep 21 2006, 05:36 PM) *
If the slopes are only 16 to 20 degrees, driving in and out will be easy. Endurance was a lot steeper than 20 degrees.


It will depend on what they are made of.
If they are mostly sandy or with some slippage I don't see how we would be able to leave the crater.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Sep 21 2006, 04:09 PM
Post #200


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



And who says we are leaving the crater after we go in ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 21 2006, 04:10 PM
Post #201


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4271
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 07:23 AM) *
Well I did do a quick check using the navcams yesterday and I did get the same answer. smile.gif

With regard to other bays, a couple of rough calculatons give:

18 degrees for Bay K1 (just to the right of Sofi)
25 degrees for Bay J1
25 degrees for Bay F1 - although we're not looking squarely onto the slope so this is probably an underestimate.

This is great, James! It's basically the sort of picture I was expecting. If you look at the bays you and I have measured on the orbital image, the "longer" bays (ie those that extend farther away from the centre of VC) are less steep.

As others have just written, for this reason I'd expect Duck Bay to be one of the least steep. (Actually, I think B1 might be even a bit less steep.)

However, recall that the near rim is considerably higher than the far, and also recall the jpl 3D model animation which strongly suggests that the slope inside the near rim is quite a bit steeper than the slope inside the far rim. We can't be sure yet that Duck Bay or B1 will be traversable. Edit: I see Doug just scooped me on this point!

As far as circumnavigation goes, I agree with Doug that it would be easy given the mobility here. However, I suspect that the lure of deep strata will be too tempting and that if (I think it's likely) Duck or B1 are deemed enterable then they will go in fairly quickly. Recall that Endurance could have been easily circumnavigated but never was.

However, as it's still winter, entering at Duck or B1 is not ideal in terms of having the rover tilted towards the sun. But as spring approaches it may not matter much anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Sep 21 2006, 04:13 PM
Post #202


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Remember, the main purpose of going to Victoria is to examine the rock layers at the BOTTEM of the crater, you know, actually driving down there and sticking the arm on the layers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Sep 21 2006, 04:48 PM
Post #203


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



It remains to be seen how deep the lowest intact layers are -- and how easy it would be to get to them. Remember, they gave up trying to get to the upper reaches of the mega ripples in Endurance and they were just a few feet away. Opportunity never got more than halfway to the bottom of Endurance.

Even if The inside of Victoria is Opportunity's last stop, I would say it would take at least a year to explore the "safe" areas before what can be learned there is tapped out and the decision needs to be made: leave the crater or attempt exploration of desireable targets in more risky parts of Victoria.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 21 2006, 05:37 PM
Post #204


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2924
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 12:23 PM) *
I told him NOT to talk about this to anyone but did he listen?... mad.gif


Sorry, did I misunderstood what you wrote to me ?

QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 12:23 PM) *
Climber, I'm reluctant to rise up a discovery I made just now : There's apparrent "caves" in the horizontal layer on the far rim on the left of Sofi. Can you spot them? I'll be killed this time if I'm wrong so I though you could do it for me. OK, now, can you write a post telling it's YOUR discovery? Obregado
Ustrax


biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

OK, it's a forgery but it COULD have been true wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Sep 21 2006, 07:34 PM
Post #205


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



You can see in detail about the attack plan in Victoria Crater at the space.com

Des Marais said that there are important discussions to take place over the next few months: Is there enough science value by driving into Victoria Crater? If so, is that research of first-rate importance if rover handlers can’t wheel Opportunity back out?

If it is so, it would be terrific!

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 21 2006, 08:12 PM
Post #206


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Doug Ellison:
QUOTE
I wouldn't be suprised to see a full circumnavigation - think of the reasons why you would want to...

I agree with all those reasons, and more. The only way we will get a good analysis of the stratigraphy and lithology is to look at the exposed outcrops in the Capes from from both sides, full filter set images, varied lighting and with the miniTES. Remember, we are looking for lateral changes in the evaporite over the crater diameter as well as point-to-point differences. Although Oppy could try to enter the crater in a Bay to get a close look at the layers, this might be risky so it would be best done after the circum-traverse. It would be good data, but only collected as a "phase 2" effort. I'm not sure that any good would come of trying to get to the bottom of the "talus pile" between the rim and the central dunefield since that will be a jumble of rim rocks, windblown dust and weathered fragments with little or no in-place bedrock exposed (or so I see now). The central dunefield would be suicidal: these are active, shifting dunes which have been found to be soft and dangerous to drive upon.

We are best served by keeping the operational Oppy mobile while we can, once we have a wheel (etc) failure then it can be made into a sessile base station.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 21 2006, 08:13 PM
Post #207


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2924
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 05:55 PM) *
Maybe I'm being a bit pessimistic but, from what we've saw so far from the far rim, I can only a few possible places (yeah...We only need one...) where Oppy can make an entrance and they're all in sites not imaged yet...There are two who I consider the best ones, they are presented in green, the others in orange...Humm...I just don't know...Looks everything so steep... sad.gif

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/posent.jpg


Here is Des Marais interpretation : "However, preliminary evidence from orbit indicates that southeast of the crater represents perhaps the most approachable trajectory to get inside the crater—if that go-ahead is given."
Not far from what you think, eh ?
BTW, Do you know what Des Marais means in French? "From marshes". Prophetic ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 21 2006, 08:26 PM
Post #208


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (climber @ Sep 21 2006, 12:13 PM) *
BTW, Do you know what Des Marais means in French? "From marshes". Prophetic ?

Very nice, but I don't want to hear from Dr. Cassée Roue who works on the Spirit team.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 21 2006, 08:35 PM
Post #209


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (MahFL @ Sep 21 2006, 05:09 PM) *
And who says we are leaving the crater after we go in ?


If we have a healthy vehicle once all available outcrop has been examined.....who says we're not?

Yes - it's a long way off - and the balance will probably have shifted to the 'risk it' side of the scale compared to Endurance - but I hope some consideration is given to extraction when deciding an entrance strategy.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Sep 21 2006, 08:46 PM
Post #210





Guests






QUOTE
MahFL wrote: Remember, the main purpose of going to Victoria is to examine the rock layers at the BOTTEM of the crater.....


I am sorry to say, but there are no accessible bedrock at the bottom of Victoria crater, only sand. The rockface we can study are along the rim, but like most I do hope the rover will crawl in and have a look at the lowest strata that it can reach. Hopefully we'll get a lookback into one age older than those Endurance crater gave us some hints about.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

48 Pages V  « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:27 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.