IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Final Approach, First good views of Victoria
Stu
post Sep 19 2006, 04:03 PM
Post #1


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Well, what does everyone think of our long-awaited first view..?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
48 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (60 - 74)
Nirgal
post Sep 19 2006, 09:32 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (alan @ Sep 19 2006, 11:21 PM) *
Nice big outcrop. Looks like a an easy taget to test the 'go and touch' after they reboot to the new software.

no further delays pleaaaase wink.gif sure there are enough other nice outcrops at the big hole in front of us wink.gif wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Sep 19 2006, 09:36 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 19 2006, 10:52 PM) *
It's very easy to match even the tiniest details between todays navcams and the orbital images. Look at this comparison, for example, centred on the largest "bay" feature on the far rim:
[attachment=7522:attachment]
You can identify many small features on the slope of the "bay".

In fact, we can now do a very firm measurement of the slope of that "bay". I've identified a feature at the top of the bay on both images (green arrow) and a feature some distance down (red arrow). The orbital map gives about 46 metres horizontal separation between the two, and today's navcam gives 13.6 metres vertical separation. Highschool trig gives an average slope of just 16.5 degrees!

Again, this is an average slope - there could be steeper and less steep portions of the bay. But, gall darn it, 16.5 degrees sounds totally doable! biggrin.gif

Edit: forgot to mention that navcam crop is 2x vertical stretched. The calculated result was correct, though.


very good work, fredk !

so does this mean that the cliffs on the south rim are "only" about 13 meters high ?
with the total crater depth only about 20-30 meters ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 19 2006, 09:54 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4271
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Nirgal, the vertical extent of the cliffs that's visible now is somewhere in the 10 - 13 metre range. But it's hard to say exactly where the top of the cliffs is (we need pancams!) and we don't clearly see the bottoms yet, though based on the orbital images they don't go much lower than we can now see.

Also this is just part of the far rim. Things may be different below us on the near rim...

As far as the total depth goes, it's guesswork as to the slopes in the main bowl, but I think we're certainly consistent with 50 or even 70 metres total depth. Actually it depends which rim you measure from - the near rim is roughly 10 metres higher than the far rim, so add 10 or so to the depth measured from the near rim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Sep 19 2006, 10:01 PM
Post #64


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



QUOTE (Pando @ Sep 19 2006, 11:47 AM) *
Damnit, I missed the party by about 2 hours....
QUOTE (Nix @ Sep 19 2006, 11:48 AM) *

The party has only just begun, don't worry smile.gif

Hehe, I meant to say that I missed the *start* of the party... laugh.gif

NICE views and panoramas everyone, the views are already quite stunning. What's funny is that traveling only some x-number of meters opened up this scenery which all of a sudden makes perfect sense now!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Sep 19 2006, 10:08 PM
Post #65


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Some more PTgui-Photoshop Mambo-Jambo laugh.gif





I wish we could share these first views in person guys, we're in for a good time -'been a long ride..

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Sep 19 2006, 10:18 PM
Post #66


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Nico's post above reminds me of something I posted two weeks ago here. Compare the top frame of the attached image to Nico's panorama. As we get closer, notice how the ground will open up at the bottom while the far rim stays comparatively the same, since we're already very close and the crater is huge. So, with navcams we're not really going to see much more detail at the far rim, but pancams will be nice smile.gif
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Sep 19 2006, 10:22 PM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



QUOTE (climber @ Sep 19 2006, 03:09 PM) *
Regarding the raised rim on the left that some of us thought was "something" sitting on the plain/apron. Is this that Tesheiner and others (?) said it could be beacon ?


No, I think this high section is blocking our view of the gap just beyond it, through which we viewed the array of beacons along the far...

Oh, I give up. It must be the cursed beacon. sad.gif

Brian
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Sep 19 2006, 11:06 PM
Post #68


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Another try at the anaglyph..



Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Sep 19 2006, 11:41 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



SENSATIONAL VC!

There's more coming down soon. Just took a quick walk down the road to photograph DSS-45 which is locked up on Opportunity at the moment. Here's a photo I took a few minutes ago. NB: Note the shadow on the dish surface from the subreflector. We are just a few degrees off the Sun at the moment.
Attached Image


If you think that we are all having fun at UMSF, imagine how Steve and the rest of the MER teams are feeling. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

Enjoy
Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Sep 19 2006, 11:51 PM
Post #70





Guests






Thank you Astro0 - im pulling one all nighter here with the hope for more images and perhaps even additional info when the US guys do their job in my nighttime. So I stay tuned.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 19 2006, 11:55 PM
Post #71


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Sep 20 2006, 09:41 AM) *
PS: Here's a link to a useful page to know what the DSN is tracking. http://rmdc.jpl.nasa.gov/nsp/watn.html


QUOTE
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /nsp/watn.html on this server.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Sep 19 2006, 11:55 PM
Post #72


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Sep 19 2006, 04:41 PM) *
NB: Note the shadow on the dish surface from the subreflector. We are just a few degrees off the Sun at the moment.


If you can climb up there to the focal point of that dish, you could fry some hot dogs there also... tongue.gif biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Sep 20 2006, 12:02 AM
Post #73


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Sep 19 2006, 11:41 PM) *
SENSATIONAL VC!

There's more coming down soon. Just took a quick walk down the road to photograph DSS-45 which is locked up on Opportunity at the moment.


Great and timely pic! Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 20 2006, 12:05 AM
Post #74


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I'm surprised that there is a downlink now, there is nothing in the relay schedule for about 8 hours. (although I sometimes struggle to understand that data so I could be wrong).

EDIT: Oh I guess you mean we're in DTE - that makes more sense. I wonder if we'll get more images or if it'll just be checkout data after the reboot into the new software.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Sep 20 2006, 12:48 AM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 20 2006, 10:05 AM) *
Oh I guess you mean we're in DTE - that makes more sense.


You're right James. DTE (Digital Tone Extractor) for anyone wondering.

Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

48 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:26 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.