My Assistant
Duck Bay, New update from Steve |
Sep 20 2006, 05:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 122 Joined: 26-June 04 From: Austria Member No.: 89 |
Hello all !
The next steps described by Steve : http://athena.cornell.edu/news/mubss/ Interesting new software capabilities also ! Robert PS: new topic because Duck Bay is the point where Oppys pancams should take the ultimate shot of Victoria |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 23 2006, 05:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
The unpegged versions are so much easier on the eye, aren't they? I am not sure if I am seeing things the same way you guys are, especially since I am getting somewhat different distances from AlgoimancerPG. The originally described "sloughing slab" doesn't really look like a "slab" to me in 3D anymore. It seems that there are several outcrops/surfaces at different distances that are juxtaposed in this line of sight. It was suggested in the original raw jpegs, but it is more apparent now.
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2006, 01:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
The unpegged versions are so much easier on the eye, aren't they? ... I am getting somewhat different distances from AlgoimancerPG .... At that range the error bounds really need to be taken into account, and unfortunately the farther away the target, the "fuzzier" features become, unless it's something nice and sharp like a cliff edge (in which case you might get better results confining it to a 2D calculation. As to the unpegged versions - yeah, it's just not fair that the only recent images we get to play with are loaded with compression artifacts |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2006, 06:06 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Roby72 Duck Bay Sep 20 2006, 05:17 PM
paxdan bingo
But I'm not really going to feel like w... Sep 20 2006, 05:40 PM
Nirgal QUOTE (paxdan @ Sep 20 2006, 07:40 PM) bi... Sep 20 2006, 07:54 PM
ElkGroveDan RE: Duck Bay Sep 20 2006, 07:56 PM
Oren Iishi QUOTE (Roby72 @ Sep 20 2006, 05:17 PM) He... Sep 20 2006, 07:44 PM
jamescanvin QUOTE (Roby72 @ Sep 21 2006, 03:17 AM) PS... Sep 20 2006, 09:40 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE We'll have to tiptoe up to Duck Bay pret... Sep 20 2006, 11:39 PM
DFinfrock "We'll have to tiptoe up to Duck Bay pret... Sep 21 2006, 12:23 AM
RNeuhaus A funny theme:
The rovers are getting older, but... Sep 21 2006, 01:24 AM
lyford Duck Bay? Could this be a reference to the Near R... Sep 21 2006, 03:07 AM
ustrax QUOTE (lyford @ Sep 21 2006, 04:07 AM) Du... Sep 21 2006, 08:49 AM
Tman QUOTE (lyford @ Sep 21 2006, 05:07 AM) Du... Sep 21 2006, 09:35 AM
ustrax QUOTE (Tman @ Sep 21 2006, 10:35 AM) You ... Sep 21 2006, 09:52 AM
Bill Harris How about this-- Duck Bay ?
--Bill Sep 21 2006, 09:53 AM
ustrax "...naming prominent features along the rim a... Sep 21 2006, 10:07 AM
babakm QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 10:07 AM) Di... Sep 21 2006, 12:56 PM
ustrax QUOTE (babakm @ Sep 21 2006, 01:56 PM) Ha... Sep 21 2006, 01:13 PM
sattrackpro QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 06:13 AM) Th... Sep 21 2006, 01:44 PM

ustrax QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Sep 21 2006, 02:44 P... Sep 21 2006, 02:06 PM

imipak QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Sep 21 2006, 02:44 P... Sep 21 2006, 08:59 PM

climber QUOTE (imipak @ Sep 21 2006, 10:59 PM) Mo... Sep 21 2006, 09:34 PM

Pando QUOTE (imipak @ Sep 21 2006, 10:59 PM)Mon... Sep 21 2006, 10:11 PM
climber QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 03:13 PM) ... Sep 21 2006, 02:07 PM
tty QUOTE (climber @ Sep 21 2006, 04:07 PM) I... Sep 21 2006, 06:49 PM
Tman Would fit very well this real Duck Bay, but I don... Sep 21 2006, 10:41 AM
ustrax I thought that Duck Bay occupied a wider area but ... Sep 21 2006, 11:33 AM
Castor Ustrax,
Here's my take on what we're seei... Sep 21 2006, 11:59 AM
jamescanvin Well I disagree with both of you!
Here is ... Sep 21 2006, 12:18 PM
Tesheiner QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 02:18 P... Sep 21 2006, 04:19 PM
Castor James,
I think you're right. You can clearly... Sep 21 2006, 12:24 PM
ustrax James, what you're saying is that none of the ... Sep 21 2006, 12:37 PM
odave Is this the duck?
(crop of Castor's image)... Sep 21 2006, 12:35 PM
ustrax QUOTE (odave @ Sep 21 2006, 01:35 PM) Is ... Sep 21 2006, 12:41 PM
Tman Guess both could be right. But if they named it in... Sep 21 2006, 01:14 PM
fredk Tesheiner, I was just preparing my version when yo... Sep 21 2006, 05:55 PM
Tesheiner QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 21 2006, 07:55 PM) Tes... Sep 21 2006, 07:38 PM
karl QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Sep 21 2006, 02:38 PM)... Sep 21 2006, 08:38 PM
Tesheiner Extending on my previous post I picked some distan... Sep 21 2006, 08:46 PM
babakm Relevant page from the book is attached. Sep 21 2006, 07:45 PM
climber QUOTE (babakm @ Sep 21 2006, 09:45 PM) Re... Sep 21 2006, 08:02 PM
jamescanvin Your right Tesheiner, it was late here so I took a... Sep 21 2006, 09:49 PM
Roby72 Is this the Duck ?
Robert
Sep 21 2006, 10:13 PM
Pando I think the one in odave's post quacks better.... Sep 21 2006, 10:39 PM
odave Hey, if it looks like a duck....
[sorry, tha... Sep 22 2006, 01:18 AM
fredk Tesheiner, I think we're pretty close on ident... Sep 22 2006, 05:04 AM
Tesheiner Ok, so our only disagreement is regarding "sl... Sep 22 2006, 08:24 AM
fredk With the appearance of the unclipped jpl pancam pa... Sep 23 2006, 02:02 AM
Nix The calibrated images take work; If there was a ch... Sep 23 2006, 09:00 PM
helvick QUOTE (Nix @ Sep 23 2006, 10:00 PM) The c... Sep 23 2006, 09:38 PM
CosmicRocker Yeah, I don't know how many times we've de... Sep 25 2006, 04:18 AM
CosmicRocker I wasn't sure which thread would be best to me... Sep 25 2006, 05:16 AM
jamescanvin CR, I don't agree that there really is and 3D ... Sep 25 2006, 05:54 AM
CosmicRocker James: I'm really at a disadvantage here, sin... Sep 26 2006, 07:50 AM
jamescanvin You just missed me at work and am now home and on ... Sep 26 2006, 08:06 AM
jamescanvin OK here is the comparison (just one pancam frame) ... Sep 26 2006, 09:36 AM
Bill Harris I'm inclined to agree with James. All due res... Sep 26 2006, 09:40 AM
fredk I'm in agreement with James. But now with the... Sep 26 2006, 04:16 PM
CosmicRocker I'm afraid that this may go down in history as... Sep 26 2006, 04:48 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:36 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|