IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

MRO Telecommunications
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Sep 26 2006, 12:06 AM
Post #1





Guests






There's a new presentation entitled "Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Telecommunications" on the JPL DESCANSO Design & Performance Summary Series web page (scroll to the bottom).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Sep 26 2006, 03:59 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



An impact - but not a HUGE one - most of the downlink for MRO is 34m based. There are 14 Xband 35m passes per week, and only 3 70m passes. Yes - higher speed with the 70m, but given that it's only 3 passes, they can be offset away from the down-dish.

Colin Clark should be picked up on this one... "a result of a longer than planned shutdown of one of the three antennas that comprise Deep Space Network (DSN),"

The DSN is only 3 dishes is it Colin?... that's just lazy journalism..Each of the three sites has at least four dishes, and a total of 15 I believe.

However there is no doubt that the DSN is in need of serious investment - a good case could be made for several more 35m's at each site - that could be used in an array ( as has already been demonstrated ) for the typical 70m requirements. A concerted effort across the whole network (perhaps even internationally) to build perhaps 6 or 9 identical dishes to reduce costs would be a wise move.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- AlexBlackwell   MRO Telecommunications   Sep 26 2006, 12:06 AM
- - Harder   I hope it is sufficiently understood by all that t...   Sep 26 2006, 03:50 PM
- - djellison   An impact - but not a HUGE one - most of the downl...   Sep 26 2006, 03:59 PM
- - monitorlizard   What JPL would like to build is an array of 400 an...   Sep 27 2006, 02:37 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (monitorlizard @ Sep 27 2006, 03:37...   Sep 27 2006, 07:21 AM
- - edstrick   There was a South African DSN site, but that was a...   Sep 27 2006, 09:46 AM
- - djellison   If you do the maths, and I'm sure it's jus...   Sep 27 2006, 09:57 AM
- - RNeuhaus   A good engineer, looks for the best equilibrium be...   Sep 27 2006, 03:47 PM
- - nprev   I had a post related in a way to this issue a coup...   Sep 27 2006, 08:51 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (nprev @ Sep 27 2006, 03:51 PM) I h...   Sep 27 2006, 09:00 PM
- - nprev   Thanks, Rodolfo. Always knew I was born 200 years ...   Sep 28 2006, 12:14 AM
- - edstrick   Ahem... Look for George O. Smith's "Venu...   Sep 28 2006, 09:33 AM
- - nprev   Never read it...bummer...thought I had an original...   Sep 28 2006, 02:21 PM
- - djellison   You mean take TDRS and turn it interplanetary. Do...   Sep 28 2006, 02:26 PM
|- - mchan   An aerospace engineering student at my alma mater ...   Sep 29 2006, 03:41 AM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 28 2006, 07:26 AM)...   Sep 29 2006, 04:54 AM
- - hendric   Why does it need to be at L1/L2? Just stick it in...   Sep 29 2006, 06:40 AM
|- - mchan   Clarification on the Mars relay sats in L1/L2. Th...   Sep 29 2006, 08:07 AM
- - djellison   err - very very very large solar panels. The trans...   Sep 29 2006, 06:41 AM
- - nprev   I think that advances in receiver sensitivity fuel...   Sep 29 2006, 07:55 AM
- - nprev   Oh, I'm sorry, mchan...did not mean to misinte...   Sep 29 2006, 08:10 AM
|- - mchan   Nothing to apologize for. I was just mentioning a...   Sep 29 2006, 09:15 AM
- - nprev   Hmm. Frankly, I don't know...my main electroni...   Sep 29 2006, 09:47 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:37 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.