My Assistant
The Far Rim, Looking at the other side |
Sep 29 2006, 12:03 AM
Post
#1
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
Since the main Victoria thread is now explicitly about Duck Bay and the surrounds here is another for far rim discussions.
Quite a bit more has been revealed after the last drives. Here's the MOC/Navcam match. James -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Oct 7 2006, 08:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Great work, Tom. Interestingly, there are some ways in which the MOC image gives more information than the HiRISE image; the MOC image shows albedo differences more dramatically than the HiRISE image. I'm sure this is because of the higher sun angle. High sun angles give you better albedo differentiation and tend to wash out fine detail.
I'm sure that if HiRISE imaged the site at the same sun angle as MOC did, you'd see more similarity in the albedo features of the two images. But as it stands, it's actually helpful to have the MOC image to show you where to look for rocky strata exposed at or near the surface, since such features are somewhat less obvious on the HiRISE image. Finally, after staring at your gif for several minutes, I keep thinking I see a boulder in the HiRISE image that doesn't have any correlated bright or dark spot in the same position in the MOC image. It's off one of the capes to the north-northwest, perhaps closer to straight north. (I don't have the gif loaded at the moment, and I can't get back to it while typing... grrr... so I can only rely on my less-than-perfect memory, here.) I can see correlating spots for a boulder slightly north of the one I'm talking about, and a conspicuous lack of anything at all visible below and south of it in the MOC image. I don't see any changes in the central dune field, however... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
jamescanvin The Far Rim Sep 29 2006, 12:03 AM
climber Don't know if this thread is about Far rim but... Sep 29 2006, 08:01 PM
RNeuhaus Here would be a problem! The PANCAM will ne... Sep 29 2006, 11:06 PM
fredk We've got a great long baseline for the far ri... Oct 2 2006, 06:11 PM
ngunn Brilliant. I think I am seeing two areas where st... Oct 2 2006, 07:01 PM
dilo Well done, Fred... I had same idea, this is based... Oct 2 2006, 08:19 PM
climber I didn't hear about this so far :
There's ... Oct 2 2006, 08:39 PM
ngunn QUOTE (climber @ Oct 2 2006, 09:39 PM) Do... Oct 2 2006, 09:01 PM
WindyT QUOTE (climber @ Oct 2 2006, 08:39 PM) I ... Oct 3 2006, 03:18 PM
Stu QUOTE (climber @ Oct 2 2006, 08:39 PM) Th... Oct 2 2006, 09:35 PM
CosmicRocker fredk, dilo...thank you for those. When I saw the... Oct 3 2006, 04:48 AM
Floyd I havent really looked at extra wide baseline ster... Oct 3 2006, 11:59 AM
Stu There's a ghost crater over there...
Can t... Oct 3 2006, 08:31 PM
dilo QUOTE (Stu @ Oct 3 2006, 08:31 PM) There... Oct 4 2006, 06:01 AM
CosmicRocker Stu: I'm not sure, but I think all we can say... Oct 4 2006, 04:47 AM
Aberdeenastro Stu,
I'm really surprised that your ghost cra... Oct 4 2006, 07:33 AM
Vladimorka Do these "ghost" craters provide the opp... Oct 4 2006, 08:58 AM
Bill Harris The ghost craters we see in these Navcams are like... Oct 4 2006, 09:13 AM
fredk With the move onto Verde we can see new parts of t... Oct 5 2006, 05:41 PM
jamescanvin Which reminds me, time for another far rim vs MOC ... Oct 6 2006, 01:50 AM
jamescanvin QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 6 2006, 11:50 AM... Oct 7 2006, 03:51 AM
mhoward Now that is a comparison. Seriously, what gift ... Oct 7 2006, 05:29 AM
Jyril QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 7 2006, 06:51 AM... Oct 7 2006, 04:05 PM
CosmicRocker That's awesome, James. The new MRO view has b... Oct 7 2006, 05:24 AM
Indian3000 I agree with you, mhoward
- "an image fallen... Oct 7 2006, 07:22 AM
CosmicRocker I wanted to compare our previously best MOC image ... Oct 7 2006, 07:46 AM
CosmicRocker If you could point that boulder out, I am sure man... Oct 7 2006, 08:42 AM
dvandorn Actually, I'm sort of impressed by this little... Oct 7 2006, 08:58 AM
dvandorn I just brought up the full-res png image, and I... Oct 7 2006, 09:12 AM
Bill Harris CR/o'Doug, is this boulder and track you are d... Oct 7 2006, 01:56 PM
Reckless I think this is another rolling boulder smaller an... Oct 7 2006, 02:38 PM
dvandorn Darn it, Bill, I don't have Photoshop right at... Oct 7 2006, 04:05 PM
Astrophil On the new image, there's a linear feature in ... Oct 7 2006, 05:44 PM
fredk Unfortunately these boulders are near the limit of... Oct 7 2006, 05:51 PM
Oersted QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 7 2006, 07:51 PM) a fl... Oct 7 2006, 08:26 PM
dvandorn OK, Fred -- with that flicker-gif, I have to agree... Oct 7 2006, 06:03 PM
Bill Harris I think that the linear feature is an "anatol... Oct 7 2006, 06:05 PM
dvandorn Agreed, Bill. The linear features on the inner wa... Oct 7 2006, 06:31 PM
Reckless Hi Guys looks like I misjudged my 'boulder tra... Oct 7 2006, 07:16 PM
Bill Harris Good flicker-GIF, fred. Here is my interpretive i... Oct 7 2006, 08:47 PM
CosmicRocker QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 7 2006, 12:51 PM) Unfo... Oct 8 2006, 05:19 AM
Bill Harris Exploring this crater is going to be more than ama... Oct 8 2006, 09:34 AM
Reckless Bill
I think this is the Dike they referred to in... Oct 8 2006, 10:31 AM
CosmicRocker Right. That is the feature that was visible when ... Oct 8 2006, 07:03 PM
Bill Harris I'm doubtful that it is a dike. We haven... Oct 8 2006, 07:54 PM
CosmicRocker I'm doubtful too. However, it is surprising t... Oct 9 2006, 04:05 AM
fredk The latest pancams (sol 986) give us a great long ... Nov 6 2006, 12:52 AM
jamescanvin Long baseline, colour anaglyph of the far rim.
... Nov 6 2006, 05:30 AM
CosmicRocker Wow, you guys are amazing. I've been struggli... Nov 6 2006, 06:16 AM
fredk Thanks for that James! I had made a version f... Nov 6 2006, 05:12 PM
climber James : your work realy give a different perspecti... Nov 6 2006, 08:49 PM
jamescanvin Thanks guys.
QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Nov 6 200... Nov 6 2006, 09:50 PM
CosmicRocker Well, it is all clear now, after finding the time ... Nov 7 2006, 05:35 AM
Stu Nice new pix this morning...
Nov 7 2006, 06:58 AM
Stu Very intrigued by the foot of the cliff here...
Nov 7 2006, 07:45 AM
alan I've just noticed in Stu's image an there ... Nov 7 2006, 12:28 PM
djellison QUOTE (alan @ Nov 7 2006, 12:28 PM) This ... Nov 7 2006, 12:37 PM
ustrax QUOTE (alan @ Nov 7 2006, 12:28 PM) I... Nov 7 2006, 12:44 PM
fredk Stu, those are nice images but they're a few d... Nov 7 2006, 05:35 PM
Stu QUOTE (fredk @ Nov 7 2006, 05:35 PM) Stu,... Nov 7 2006, 05:40 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:55 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|