IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

NASA Announces Public Meeting for Proposed Mars Mission
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Oct 4 2006, 07:50 PM
Post #1





Guests






NASA Announces Public Meeting for Proposed Mars Mission
MEDIA ADVISORY: M06-154
October 4, 2006
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Mariner9
post Oct 5 2006, 05:18 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 220
Joined: 13-October 05
Member No.: 528



Yes, I also noticed a mention of the mission using either an RTG or solar panel power. I have trouble imagining that JPL is still pondering that move this late into the design.... so have to wonder if that is also a political move on their part to give the impression that if they are indeed going with RTG, that the decision was carefully weighed from the engineering standpoint and they didn't just jump to that conclusion too quickly.

The sucess of the MERs might be playing a part in all this. The conventional engineering wisdom before the mission landed was that solar panels would loose effectiveness over time as the dust collected. At 2.5 years and going strong, MER is putting that concern to rest. So even if using an RTG is still a better choice for MSL, it gives ammunition to the anti-nuke crowd to point at MER and say that solar can do the job.

I hope they go with an RTG... because we all know that in spite of the improvement in solar cells over the last 20 years, many of the outer planets missions still need nuclear power. Loosing this one because of politics would bode ill for future missions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- AlexBlackwell   NASA Announces Public Meeting for Proposed Mars Mission   Oct 4 2006, 07:50 PM
- - gndonald   I see NASA is still afraid to show the RTG power s...   Oct 5 2006, 01:30 AM
|- - punkboi   QUOTE (gndonald @ Oct 4 2006, 06:30 PM) I...   Oct 5 2006, 05:30 PM
- - Mariner9   Yes, I also noticed a mention of the mission using...   Oct 5 2006, 05:18 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (Mariner9 @ Oct 5 2006, 06:18 PM) A...   Oct 5 2006, 07:09 PM
- - lyford   From the release: QUOTE An alternative mission wou...   Oct 5 2006, 07:50 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (lyford @ Oct 5 2006, 12:50 PM) I w...   Oct 6 2006, 12:19 AM
- - lyford   I agree it's a rather bland presentation of th...   Oct 6 2006, 12:51 AM
- - Mariner9   I stand by my point that the anti-nuke crowd could...   Oct 6 2006, 01:32 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Mariner9 @ Oct 5 2006, 09:32 PM) I...   Oct 6 2006, 03:28 PM
- - dvandorn   The problem is, if you tell these people that you ...   Oct 6 2006, 03:53 AM
- - djellison   The Anti's couldn't stop Pioneer, Voyager,...   Oct 6 2006, 07:23 AM
|- - gndonald   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 6 2006, 03:23 PM) ...   Oct 7 2006, 02:50 PM
- - Rakhir   Nasa finally admits plutonium dangers   Oct 6 2006, 04:57 PM
|- - helvick   This is out of date, inaccurate and makes some cla...   Oct 6 2006, 05:53 PM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Rakhir @ Oct 6 2006, 12:57 PM) Nas...   Oct 6 2006, 09:05 PM
- - lyford   I agree that much of the noise is maddening, but I...   Oct 7 2006, 04:30 PM
- - MarkL   I greatly enjoyed this discussion. It seems to me...   Oct 10 2006, 01:36 PM
- - RNeuhaus   NASA Weighs Power-Source Options for Mars Rover ...   Oct 16 2006, 09:18 PM
- - edstrick   You have to remember that one of the main methods ...   Oct 17 2006, 11:51 AM
- - PhilCo126   Well much a do about nothing ??? I believe the ...   Oct 17 2006, 05:17 PM
- - MahFL   The general public don't know what a nuclear e...   Oct 17 2006, 05:26 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 11:48 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.