My Assistant
Enceladus versus Miranda, A same geological history |
Oct 15 2006, 12:31 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 16-May 06 From: Geneva, Switzerland Member No.: 773 |
By making order in some of my old documents about the Voyager 2 mission, I got a look on the 20 years old Miranda pictures and I realized how similar Miranda and Enceladus really are.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA01490.jpg Both have about the same size, the same density (same composition ?). And the surfaces are amazingly similar too (even if Miranda's one seems in general older). Both might be in resonance with another moon, Ariel and Dione respectively (we could even expand the similarities to these two moons). Miranda and Enceladus surfaces comprise corona-like structures surounded by older cratered terrains. In both cases, one is exactly localized at the south pole (self-rolling to place this area of low density at the south pole is suspected in both cases). The most striking similar features seem to be Elsinor corona on Miranda and the corona-like structure on Enceladus localized between about 120 and 150 west. These two worlds may share a common geological story. The origin of the Miranda features is still not really understood nowadays. So the current studies of Enceladus might also help to better understand Miranda (and vice versa). Does someone know if serious comparative studies exist (or are on the way) ? I did not find any yet. Marc. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 23 2006, 04:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
The sphereicity of Miranda and Enceladus are quite different. To me it suggests vastly different interior stucture, Enceladus being liquidy up to quite close to the surface, and Miranda being cold and rigid to great depths.
{not to rule out amorphous affects of icy materials under stress at Miranda} |
|
|
|
MarcF Enceladus versus Miranda Oct 15 2006, 12:31 PM
Rob Pinnegar It's hard to imagine that this *wouldn't* ... Oct 19 2006, 02:30 AM
elakdawalla There's some people working on this very activ... Oct 19 2006, 05:01 PM
MarcF Thanks a lot Emily.
Really interesting.
I think th... Oct 19 2006, 06:32 PM
Rob Pinnegar I just went back and took a quick look at some of ... Oct 23 2006, 03:25 PM
MarcF I indeed forgot to mention this other important si... Oct 23 2006, 04:37 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 12:34 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|