My Assistant
An attempt to super resolution imaging |
Oct 17 2006, 08:52 AM
Post
#1
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1621 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
Hi,
Here is a try to super resolution imaging, by using Iris, a software made for astronomical imagery processing. I took the Sol 984 images and stack and align them to have a better resolution. Before, I resised all the frames at 200%. One of the 15 originals raw images : And the final picture : ![]() The result is a little visible, but, to have better resolution, I need more than 15 pictures (in astronomical processing, we need a thousand pictures extract from an avi film). -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Oct 17 2006, 09:00 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Realistically, you need to be using the uncompressed data - not raw JPG's complete with compression artifacts.
The analogy with planetary imaging with a webcam doesn't hold too well. The reason one takes hundreds of images is because within those hundreds there will be perhaps a dozen frames of near perfect 'seing' where just for a moment the column mass of air was not screwing the image quite so much. With surface-to-surface imaging such as these super-res sequences, that's not the case - every frame you aquire is a 'good' one so you don't need hundreds of images. What might be interesting is to compare one of these sequences ( given that the early Olympia outcrop super reses from the early 700's is on the PDS now ) - and try it with the JPG's - the RAD's and then compare to the Pancam teams efforts - http://pancam.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_ins...t/superres.html Doug |
|
|
|
Ant103 An attempt to super resolution imaging Oct 17 2006, 08:52 AM
tedstryk I have played around with the JPEGs, and yes, supe... Oct 17 2006, 10:39 AM
Ant103 Yes, I know this fact and know the difference betw... Oct 17 2006, 10:28 AM
ugordan QUOTE (Ant103 @ Oct 17 2006, 11:28 AM) Yo... Oct 17 2006, 10:46 AM
Ant103 Yes, I apply a sharpenning to the result and some ... Oct 17 2006, 10:52 AM
antoniseb With most astronomical images, there is very littl... Oct 17 2006, 11:41 AM
MarkL QUOTE (Ant103 @ Oct 17 2006, 08:52 AM) Hi... Oct 17 2006, 05:25 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:39 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|