IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Polar comparisons between Earth and Mars, A better understanding of the Sun & local galaxy medium
climber
post Oct 17 2006, 08:58 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I didn't read about an idea I had, so, may be you'll be interested to share your comments or point to me some references talking about it.
Idea : Ice, in the Polar caps keep the history of the atmosphere of planets. I was thinking that, by comparing Polar caps ice from both Earth and Mars that formed at the same time, we could deduce the behavior of the Sun. Did it gave less energy or if did the solar system crossed a dust cloud....?? I was particulary thinking of a recent period, 14 & 15 century when northern (Earth) hemisphere get a mini glaciation. The results are not very deep inside the ice and can eventualy be probed on Mars in a resonnable future. I don't think Phoenix will do it since it's not going THAT North.
Does it make sense to you or am I totaly wrong ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Oct 17 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Maybe, the poles are only formed due to the axis inclination. Another point is that the Antartic is the polar which resembles mostly to Mars South pole. The Mars' South pole is mostly made of solid carbon dioxide (dry ice) than the Mars' North pole. Anyway, both poles have water ice underneath of its dry ice covering. However, there is pitted layer which is dry ice, but the material below, which makes up the floors of the pits and the bulk of the polar cap, is water ice.

On the other hand, that I know that the difference between the two poles is that the south pole dry-ice cover is slightly thicker, about eight meters, and does not disappear entirely during the summertime.

One interesting point is about how the atmospheres of the inner planets, Venus, Earth and Mars are compared to each other. At the beginning of the formation of solar system, it is assumed that Earth, Venus, and Mars had similar in the total carbon dioxide content, with Earth having most of its carbon dioxide locked up in marine carbonates and Venus's carbon dioxide being in the atmosphere and causing the runaway greenhouse effect. By contrast, the 8 meter layer on the south polar ice cap on Mars means the planet has only a small fraction of the carbon dioxide found on Earth and Venus.

That means that the theory that Mars had a warm and wet at the beginning is doubtful due to the fact there is not much carbone dioxide found in the Martian poles to float in the atmosphere to trap enough solar energy to warm the planet.

That has leaded me to think that the best phrase that Mars was a cold, wet planet. Then where will be the water? It could be that the subterranean plumbing would allow for liquid water to be sealed off underneath the surface.

Dr. Andrew Ingersoll is a known specialist of Mars Poles which I have read mostly.

A resume of its article:

"The North residual cap -- the part that survives the summer -- is made of water ice. The South residual cap seems to be made of frozen carbon dioxide, otherwise known as dry ice, but we don't know if this is a veneer a few meters thick or a solid block that extends down 2 or 3 kilometers. These images may help us decide."

About the selection Phoenix landing, you can find at the other topic which is related to Phoenix. There you can find it.

High Resolution Views Comparing the Martian North and South Polar Residual Caps

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paxdan
post Oct 17 2006, 10:29 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 563
Joined: 29-March 05
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (climber @ Oct 17 2006, 09:58 PM) *
I was particulary thinking of a recent period, 14 & 15 century when northern (Earth) hemisphere get a mini glaciation.

The mini-ice age is well correlated* with the Maunder minimum period of reduced sunspot activity. No dust cloud required.

*correlation, of course, does not equal causation
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 18 2006, 08:25 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (paxdan @ Oct 18 2006, 12:29 AM) *
The mini-ice age is well correlated* with the Maunder minimum period of reduced sunspot activity. No dust cloud required.
*correlation, of course, does not equal causation

Would be nice to know if Marsian ice can show measurable effects for that period. That's the meaning of this thread. A correlation between the two planets would may be not a scientific breakthrough but could mentaly change the way of thinking. I know that some people don't think that the Greenhouse effect is real. By comparing Mars and Earth we could sort out the "exterior" effect i.e. the Sun or whatever can be of some influence .


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Oct 18 2006, 11:41 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (climber @ Oct 17 2006, 09:58 PM) *
by comparing Polar caps ice from both Earth and Mars that formed at the same time, we could deduce the behavior of the Sun.


I think that's a very good question. The ice core record for each planet should contain two superimposed signals, one solar/environmental and one planet-specific. It should be possible - and well worth doing - to sort them out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 12:03 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.