My Assistant
T20 (October 25, 2006) |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Oct 20 2006, 10:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The mission description document is now online (1.06 Mb PDF).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 22 2006, 07:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 16-May 06 From: Geneva, Switzerland Member No.: 773 |
"It just happened to be there", this is what I wanted to say by using the word "luck", Jason. Sorry for my imperfect English. To be honest, I also think that Tortola is rather an impact structure, unlike Ganesa which really looks like a cryovolcanic dome in SAR images. However, I thought that Tortola's volcanic origin was quite well accepted by the specialists. This is the reason why I'm so impatient to see a SAR picture of Tortola. But I'm not convinced that we will get the answer during the coming T20 flyby.
Marc. |
|
|
|
AlexBlackwell T20 (October 25, 2006) Oct 20 2006, 10:08 PM
MarcF I read in the T20 mission description document tha... Oct 21 2006, 06:56 PM
Olvegg The altitude will be about 100,000 km, judging fro... Oct 21 2006, 07:35 PM
Phil Stooke SAR resolution does not scale with distance the wa... Oct 21 2006, 07:50 PM
MarcF 100,000 km seems really a great distance (it's... Oct 21 2006, 08:14 PM
Holder of the Two Leashes Something's wrong here. 100,000 km above Tita... Oct 22 2006, 12:14 AM
ugordan This is probably using a new method for distant SA... Oct 22 2006, 12:25 AM
volcanopele I would double check that 100,000 km number, but e... Oct 22 2006, 04:49 AM
Holder of the Two Leashes QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 21 2006, 11:49 P... Oct 22 2006, 10:24 PM
Big_Gazza What I have been wondering is that why have we not... Oct 22 2006, 01:41 PM
MarcF I think it's just by luck that they observed T... Oct 22 2006, 02:35 PM
volcanopele There are a lot of little faculae in that region, ... Oct 22 2006, 05:11 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (MarcF @ Oct 22 2006, 12:05 PM) ... Oct 22 2006, 08:38 PM
Decepticon RE: T20 (October 25, 2006) Oct 23 2006, 01:37 AM
ugordan It's a rare moment to see this much structure ... Oct 25 2006, 07:29 AM
djellison bog standard RGBification-with-a-tweak-of-colour-a... Oct 25 2006, 07:45 AM
helvick Seems (to me) like you lost the banding structure ... Oct 25 2006, 08:11 AM
djellison It's just about visible, but not so clearly in... Oct 25 2006, 08:41 AM
remcook Interesting structure. It looks real. Any ideas on... Oct 25 2006, 08:59 AM
ugordan I'd guess around 50-60 degrees N, covering the... Oct 25 2006, 09:07 AM
remcook 50-60 degrees north is where the North Polar vorte... Oct 25 2006, 10:58 AM
ugordan Keep in mind we're looking from north of Titan... Oct 25 2006, 11:44 AM
yaohua2000 CODEORBITER UTC ALTITUDE RANGE-RATE VELOCITY
200... Oct 25 2006, 12:25 PM
MarcF Voyager 2 already photographed such a structure ar... Oct 25 2006, 12:36 PM
remcook The "polar collar", seen by Voyager 2, a... Oct 25 2006, 12:44 PM
Juramike T20 distant targeted look of the NE Shangri-La Bas... Oct 11 2007, 07:55 PM
Juramike Real subtle, but it looks like there might be a Ks... Oct 12 2007, 01:02 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:00 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|