My Assistant
MARS 5 image comparison |
Nov 2 2006, 09:44 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 295 Joined: 2-March 04 From: Central California Member No.: 45 |
Thanks to Ustrax in this post , I've had a chance to see some of the Russian images I've never seen.
It looks like they had some problems with stitching or something. Note these two: February 25 program 4 image 8Z ![]() Larger February 26 program 5 image 12Z ![]() Larger Same approx. area, one has a folded landscape on the left, the other has an old crater...right hand side appears to be the same though. I don't know if there's a way to find out where this area is to compare it to MOC images... -------------------- Eric P / MizarKey
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 6 2006, 11:15 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 4-November 06 From: Moscow, RU Member No.: 1323 |
>> Welcome to our discussion, Dio. It's good to have contributions from Russia. If you look back through this >> forum, under Venus, Moon and Mars, you will see we have a lot of interest in the Soviet missions. Of course >> there is still a lot more to learn. But I am especially interested in future developments including
>> Phobos-Grunt and Luna-Glob. Thank you, Phil. I definilely heard from some person working in Lavochkin that Luna-Glob is entirely paper work and PR of authorities. No real work was accomplished in this area since middle 90th. >> Seems to me that one site in Cuba, one in Crimea and one near Vladivostok should work just as well as >> Goldstone-Madrid-Canberra except perhaps at high southern latitudes. In retrospective view, Cuba could be nice place geographically, but politically troublesome. |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2006, 05:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Canberra Member No.: 558 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2006, 07:44 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 4-November 06 From: Moscow, RU Member No.: 1323 |
In your opinion is this true of the Phobos Grunt mission also? My words on this subject here are just the second-hand testimony, so my personal opinion is of no value. The same source as above claimed that assembly of Phobos-Grunt craft is gradually carried out, though it is not work of high internal priority for Lavochkin and it was repeatedly stalled during last years. After multipe delays, re-plannings etc., noone could get qualified estimate of a-priory success ratio. There is lots of scepsis about this project. But the situation is different from Luna-Glob. As I was informed, modern Lavochkin projects could be roughly devided to three parts. First, alive ones with approximately clean perspective, include Spectr-R and Electro-L. Second are half-alive, Phobos-Grunt and Spectr-UF among them. 3rd, "Luna-Glob", "Resonans" and "Spectr-M" were characterized as programs, existence of which "became known to Lavochkin collaborators from newspapers" and "to this list one could easily append landing on the surface of Sun and delivery of samples from Pluto". |
|
|
|
MizarKey MARS 5 image comparison Nov 2 2006, 09:44 PM
4th rock from the sun I really haven't checked but I think that thos... Nov 3 2006, 11:48 AM
ngunn QUOTE (4th rock from the sun @ Nov 3 2006, 11... Nov 3 2006, 01:05 PM
4th rock from the sun QUOTE (ngunn @ Nov 3 2006, 02:05 PM) Woul... Nov 3 2006, 09:39 PM
tedstryk That is some impressive image location!
I a... Nov 4 2006, 12:11 AM
babakm I find Google Mars pretty useful for these kind of... Nov 3 2006, 05:17 PM
4th rock from the sun Nice match! It does show the data in context. ... Nov 3 2006, 09:33 PM
babakm QUOTE (4th rock from the sun @ Nov 3 2006, 09... Nov 4 2006, 02:35 AM
djellison The reason they used to use film developed on boar... Nov 4 2006, 12:19 AM
dvandorn Also recall that the Lunar Orbiter series worked i... Nov 4 2006, 04:49 AM
Dio >> Same approx. area, one has a folded lands... Nov 4 2006, 09:40 PM
Myran QUOTE djellison wrote: The reason they used to use... Nov 5 2006, 02:24 AM
Dio LO images with typical damages:
http://www.lpi.us... Nov 5 2006, 08:49 AM
tty QUOTE (Dio @ Nov 5 2006, 09:49 AM) LO ima... Nov 5 2006, 04:29 PM
Phil Stooke Welcome to our discussion, Dio. It's good to ... Nov 5 2006, 02:13 PM
JonClarke QUOTE (Dio @ Nov 12 2006, 07:44 PM) My wo... Nov 13 2006, 08:36 PM
MizarKey Many thanks to Babakm for his earlier post with co... Nov 10 2006, 07:30 PM
Phil Stooke 4th Rock said "The strange thing is flying a ... Nov 12 2006, 09:24 PM
4th rock from the sun Ok, I understand that, I was just thinking out lou... Nov 12 2006, 11:48 PM
nprev Yes, really not at all bad...comparable to many Ma... Nov 13 2006, 02:05 AM
4th rock from the sun The problem with the Mars 5 (and 4) images is the ... Nov 13 2006, 12:12 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:56 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|