MEPAG - Two new reports |
![]() ![]() |
MEPAG - Two new reports |
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guests ![]() |
Update to the Robotic Mars Exploration Strategy 2007-2016 (MAPG) (12.17 Mb PDF)
Findings of the Mars Special Regions Science Analysis Group (Astrobiology, Volume 6, Number 5, 2006). Non-subscribers might also note that the publishers of Astrobiology are, for the time being, granting free online access to that entire issue, which contains a couple of other interesting items. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 242 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Ohio, USA Member No.: 34 ![]() |
Great links. I think it's a measure of the sophistication of this site that it has a librarian!!
![]() Thanks for taking on the responsibility. I really appreciate your efforts. |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guests ![]() |
Great links. I think it's a measure of the sophistication of this site that it has a librarian!! ![]() Thanks for taking on the responsibility. I really appreciate your efforts. I believe it was Shakespeare who wrote, "Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon 'em." For me, it was the third option (thanks to Emily). ![]() |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guests ![]() |
The "Mars Science Workshop and Conference Reports" section on the MEPAG website has been updated.
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Guests ![]() |
There's a newly posted MEPAG report:
Report from the 2013 Mars Science Orbiter (MSO) Second Science Analysis Group (May 2007) (1.2 Mb PDF) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 242 Joined: 21-December 04 Member No.: 127 ![]() |
Fascinating report, Alex.
While they don't come out and say it, it seems clear to me that they favor a geology and geophysics orbiter with a small landed package for 2013. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 8-May 05 Member No.: 381 ![]() |
Nice to see a lot of support for an imaging SAR for the 2013 orbiter, even if it's only for an enhanced version of the spacecraft. I know I'm not the only one who would like to see that instrument flown.
![]() |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
![]()
Post
#8
|
Guests ![]() |
Nice to see a lot of support for an imaging SAR for the 2013 orbiter, even if it's only for an enhanced version of the spacecraft. I know I'm not the only one who would like to see that instrument flown. ![]() Me, too. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd June 2024 - 06:46 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |