My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
VIMS observes bright streaks, Mountains perhaps? |
Dec 12 2006, 06:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Mountains on Titan - news via jupiter list:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jupiter_list/message/7565 Edit: Shouldn't be in T21 thread - don't know how to move it though. |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 06:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Massive Mountain Range Imaged on Saturn's Moon Titan
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press-rele....cfm?newsID=709 I'm not so sure I agree with their conclusion, but they seem to think that based on the appearance of the dark "stuff" to the east of the bright streaks at different wavelengths, that that dark "stuff" is topographic shading and that the bright streaks are mountain chains. I am not sure I agree with that statement. I can't go into detail why, but I think bright streaks are some kind of "stain" on the surface, not topographic. The more interesting news is the statement: QUOTE The composition of dunes that run across much of Titan is also much clearer. "The dunes seem to consist of sand grains made of organics, built on water-ice bedrock, and there may also be some snow and bright deposits," Brown said. VIMS was able to resolve the dunes and able to see the compositional differences between the dunes and the inter-dune regions. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 07:32 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
I've been looking forward to seeing something like this:
Combined IR and radar views volcanopele: what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface? |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 07:34 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface? Westward. -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 12 2006, 07:36 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 07:40 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
volcanopele: what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface? West to east -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 08:45 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I'm not so sure I agree with their conclusion, but they seem to think that based on the appearance of the dark "stuff" to the east of the bright streaks at different wavelengths, that that dark "stuff" is topographic shading and that the bright streaks are mountain chains. I am not sure I agree with that statement. I can't go into detail why, but I think bright streaks are some kind of "stain" on the surface, not topographic. Thanks for posting the proper link. Are you questioning the whole mountain range idea or just a more subtle aspect of their interpretation? Does the 3D appearance of the 'mountain' image arise from processing based on an assumption about the topography or is it intrinsic to the data? |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 08:48 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
They could be mountain ranges, but I question that they are seeing topographic shading, which underpins their mountain interpretation. I think the "3D" appearance arises from the pattern of bright-dark material in that region that makes it look like some of the dark material is actually topographic shading.
Though this image, http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...fm?imageID=2381, is really good for having been taken from 12 billion km away -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 09:09 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Though this image, http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...fm?imageID=2381, is really good for having been taken from 12 billion km away It is, isn't it! Looks a bit lke that thing on Iapetus. |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 09:17 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 12 2006, 10:47 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 20-November 05 From: Mare Desiderii Member No.: 563 |
VIMS was able to resolve the dunes and able to see the compositional differences between the dunes and the inter-dune regions. There's an image supporting this (side-by-side comparison of radar and VIMS) that appears on the VIMS site (caption is near the bottom), but not on the JPL site, for some reason. (The same region with VIMS overlaying radar is here, but the caption doesn't mention the dunes.) |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2006, 03:29 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 131 Joined: 30-August 06 From: Moscow, Idaho Member No.: 1086 |
I guess I shouldn't be surprised to find that this group picked up on the newly released VIMS T20 images so quickly!
Originally the RADAR/VIMS with the dunes there was supposed to be an animated .gif blink, I thought, but maybe we were going overboard with the blinks, so they just released the straight VIMS over RADAR comparison. I kind of like the blink version better, as it seems to be the best way to intercompare the two. Did you see the sinuous red streak near the RADAR circular feature in the lower left? Better than 400m resolution -- we're getting down toward the scale of flows on, say, Mauna Loa. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2006, 03:46 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 131 Joined: 30-August 06 From: Moscow, Idaho Member No.: 1086 |
Aha -- you have to go into the 'full-res' part to get the blinks. Here are direct links to them:
T20 outbound noodle and mountains over T17 global Cryoflow and dunes |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2006, 10:45 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Thanks Jason B. Can you (or anyone) answer the question I put (not very clearly) to the other Jason? it's about the 'mountains' image. Has there been any reprojection of the image following 'draping' over inferred topography?
I suspect the answer is 'No' but just want to be sure. |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2006, 01:41 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 550 |
I hope this is correct about the taller mountains, because I was always very fond of the orographic interpretation regarding those mid-southern latitude clouds.
They sound pretty conclusive about it. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:02 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|