IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
VIMS observes bright streaks, Mountains perhaps?
ngunn
post Dec 12 2006, 06:30 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Mountains on Titan - news via jupiter list:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jupiter_list/message/7565
Edit: Shouldn't be in T21 thread - don't know how to move it though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2006, 06:41 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Massive Mountain Range Imaged on Saturn's Moon Titan
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press-rele....cfm?newsID=709

I'm not so sure I agree with their conclusion, but they seem to think that based on the appearance of the dark "stuff" to the east of the bright streaks at different wavelengths, that that dark "stuff" is topographic shading and that the bright streaks are mountain chains. I am not sure I agree with that statement. I can't go into detail why, but I think bright streaks are some kind of "stain" on the surface, not topographic.

The more interesting news is the statement:

QUOTE
The composition of dunes that run across much of Titan is also much clearer. "The dunes seem to consist of sand grains made of organics, built on water-ice bedrock, and there may also be some snow and bright deposits," Brown said.


VIMS was able to resolve the dunes and able to see the compositional differences between the dunes and the inter-dune regions.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 12 2006, 07:32 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I've been looking forward to seeing something like this:
Combined IR and radar views

volcanopele: what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Dec 12 2006, 07:34 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (alan @ Dec 12 2006, 08:32 PM) *
what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface?

Westward.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Dec 12 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #5





Guests






QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 12 2006, 09:34 AM) *
Westward.

And I was going to say "leeward." tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2006, 07:40 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (alan @ Dec 12 2006, 12:32 PM) *
volcanopele: what direction does the wind blow on the Titan's surface?

West to east


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Dec 12 2006, 08:45 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 12 2006, 06:41 PM) *
I'm not so sure I agree with their conclusion, but they seem to think that based on the appearance of the dark "stuff" to the east of the bright streaks at different wavelengths, that that dark "stuff" is topographic shading and that the bright streaks are mountain chains. I am not sure I agree with that statement. I can't go into detail why, but I think bright streaks are some kind of "stain" on the surface, not topographic.


Thanks for posting the proper link. smile.gif
Are you questioning the whole mountain range idea or just a more subtle aspect of their interpretation?
Does the 3D appearance of the 'mountain' image arise from processing based on an assumption about the topography or is it intrinsic to the data?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2006, 08:48 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



They could be mountain ranges, but I question that they are seeing topographic shading, which underpins their mountain interpretation. I think the "3D" appearance arises from the pattern of bright-dark material in that region that makes it look like some of the dark material is actually topographic shading.

Though this image, http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...fm?imageID=2381, is really good for having been taken from 12 billion km away ohmy.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Dec 12 2006, 09:09 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 12 2006, 08:48 PM) *
Though this image, http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...fm?imageID=2381, is really good for having been taken from 12 billion km away ohmy.gif


It is, isn't it! Looks a bit lke that thing on Iapetus. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Dec 12 2006, 09:17 PM
Post #10


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 12 2006, 08:48 PM) *
....really good for having been taken from 12 billion km away ohmy.gif

Very clever of them to put such a good instrument on Voyager 1 smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JTN
post Dec 12 2006, 10:47 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Mare Desiderii
Member No.: 563



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 12 2006, 06:41 PM) *
VIMS was able to resolve the dunes and able to see the compositional differences between the dunes and the inter-dune regions.

There's an image supporting this (side-by-side comparison of radar and VIMS) that appears on the VIMS site (caption is near the bottom), but not on the JPL site, for some reason. (The same region with VIMS overlaying radar is here, but the caption doesn't mention the dunes.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason W Barnes
post Dec 13 2006, 03:29 AM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 30-August 06
From: Moscow, Idaho
Member No.: 1086



I guess I shouldn't be surprised to find that this group picked up on the newly released VIMS T20 images so quickly!

Originally the RADAR/VIMS with the dunes there was supposed to be an animated .gif blink, I thought, but maybe we were going overboard with the blinks, so they just released the straight VIMS over RADAR comparison. I kind of like the blink version better, as it seems to be the best way to intercompare the two. Did you see the sinuous red streak near the RADAR circular feature in the lower left? Better than 400m resolution -- we're getting down toward the scale of flows on, say, Mauna Loa.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason W Barnes
post Dec 13 2006, 03:46 AM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 30-August 06
From: Moscow, Idaho
Member No.: 1086



Aha -- you have to go into the 'full-res' part to get the blinks. Here are direct links to them:

T20 outbound noodle and mountains over T17 global

Cryoflow and dunes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Dec 13 2006, 10:45 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Thanks Jason B. Can you (or anyone) answer the question I put (not very clearly) to the other Jason? it's about the 'mountains' image. Has there been any reprojection of the image following 'draping' over inferred topography?

I suspect the answer is 'No' but just want to be sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt
post Dec 14 2006, 01:41 AM
Post #15


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 11-November 05
Member No.: 550



I hope this is correct about the taller mountains, because I was always very fond of the orographic interpretation regarding those mid-southern latitude clouds.

They sound pretty conclusive about it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:02 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.