Launch pad descriptions |
Launch pad descriptions |
Dec 14 2006, 06:10 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 31-October 06 Member No.: 1305 |
Does anyone have a link or document that describes launch pad structures? I'm interested and curious about the launch gantry structure, what structures holds up the rocket, and where does the spent exhaust goes during launch.
Thank you. |
|
|
Dec 14 2006, 08:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
I suspect the place to ask this would be at nasaspaceflight.com
Each type of rocket is going to have a different pad - your likely to find the most info about the shuttle pads - a quick Google brings up a few interesting hits. http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/facilities/lc39a.html http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/nasafact/padstoc.htm I'm woefully unqualified to answer your questions but I can have a quick stab. No structures hold rockets up, if they are strong enough to survive the ascent they can quite happily sit on the ground under there own weight, the gantry is used to service the rocket, not hold it up. The exhaust go into a flame trench to direct it away from the vehicle at launch. -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 15 2006, 04:31 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 123 Joined: 21-February 05 Member No.: 175 |
.
|
|
|
Dec 15 2006, 02:57 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Does anyone have a link or document that describes launch pad structures? I'm interested and curious about the launch gantry structure, what structures holds up the rocket, and where does the spent exhaust goes during launch. Thank you. Actually, nothing holds up a rocket. They are all basically self supporting (not going to go into heritage Atlas here). Some even have to be held down during ignition (Atlas, Delta IV and STS). Titan-IV and Delta II are free standing. |
|
|
Dec 15 2006, 05:28 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The only exception that I am aware of in terms of there being any need to "hold up the rocket" was the original Atlas. And even with that vehicle, it was not done by structures at the pad. That original Atlas vehicle was made with a skin milled so thin that the tanks needed to be pressurized, or the whole missile would crumple and "deflate," like a large metal balloon!
So, for those early Atlas vehicles, when not filled with pressurized fuel, they were filled with pressurized air, which held the rocket up. Now, on the other hand, you can argue the position that bolting a rocket down at the base "holds it up" since without such a connection at the base, many rockets would fall over sideways, especially under any kind of wind pressure. Most rockets are attached to their pad structures with explosive bolts (the entire weight of the STS vehicle on the pad, for example, passes through the SRB engine nozzle assemblies, which are attached to the pad with explosive bolts). Some, like the Saturn V, have (or had) hold-down arms which keep the vehicle firmly attached to the pad until all engines are up to full thrust and all other indications are clear for release. The most fascinating pad-release mechanism I ever heard of was for the Saturn V. After the explosive bolts were blown and after the hold-down arms released the vehicle, the Saturn V still had one more process to go through. Huge soft-iron rivet-head bolts were attached to the rocket and through slots in the launcher which were smaller than the bolt heads. As the vehicle lifted off, these bolts were pulled through the slots and the soft iron was literally pulled through the slots, deforming like thick taffy as they pulled through. This attenuated vibrational shocks and especially any tendency for the rocket to lift off in very short, rhythmic "spurts" which could shake the whole stack dangerously. So, the final contact between a Saturn V and the ground was four huge soft-iron bolts that were forced to extrude through slots in the launcher. Fascinating stuff! -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Guest_MarkG_* |
Jan 7 2007, 11:43 PM
Post
#6
|
Guests |
'Umbilical Systems: V-2 to Saturn V' might have some of the information you're looking for. It includes diagrams of a lot of the launch-pad systems for different rockets up to the Saturns.
http://www-lib.ksc.nasa.gov/lib/Archives/umbilical.pdf I know I have some other documents with that kind of information, but with multiple gigabytes to search through, most with non-descriptive filenames from the NTRS server they'd take a while to track down . |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 02:52 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |