IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2006XG1, another Torino 1 NEO (for now)
nprev
post Dec 26 2006, 10:17 PM
Post #1


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8791
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Here's a Christmas present for us all...a 0.7 km NEO may make a 4200 km altitude Earth flyby on Halloween, 2041: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2006xg1.html


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
nprev
post Dec 27 2006, 01:54 AM
Post #2


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8791
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yeah, I'm sure that will be the case. I noticed that the NASA NEO site already had 76 observations logged between 11-22 Dec; it must be very favorably placed, so we should see it drop off the radar screen after the holidays.

Good thing, too. 1900 megatons of impact energy could be a bit unpleasant. With that in mind, does anybody think that we should get serious about devising a way to deflect these things, if it's ever needed? I like the idea of "docking" a DS1-style propulsion system to a threatening rock & steering it clear...or, ideally, steering it slowly into an exploitable orbit for future mining! smile.gif

And on a somewhat related topic, is there anything at all we could do about an imminent long-period comet impact? I can't think of a single countermeasure. (Okay, I confess...I rented the classic When Worlds Collide two days ago, and it's been bugging me ever since... rolleyes.gif )


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Dec 27 2006, 08:59 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 27 2006, 01:54 AM) *
1900 megatons of impact energy could be a bit unpleasant. With that in mind, does anybody think that we should get serious about devising a way to deflect these things, if it's ever needed? I like the idea of "docking" a DS1-style propulsion system to a threatening rock & steering it clear...or, ideally, steering it slowly into an exploitable orbit for future mining! smile.gif

And on a somewhat related topic, is there anything at all we could do about an imminent long-period comet impact? I can't think of a single countermeasure. (Okay, I confess...I rented the classic When Worlds Collide two days ago, and it's been bugging me ever since... rolleyes.gif )


The most attractive proposal I've seen is for a 'gravitational tractor' where a vehicle with an ion-engine is held aloft 'above' the target rock/dustpile/snowdrift and gradually applies a small force (equivalent to it's local weight, so merely ounces in the case of a test vehicle) for years at a time. In the case of a more urgent removal mission, you could send more spacecraft rather than being stuck with a Saturn V/Icarus scenario. By remaining perched above the sweet spot you could have the best possible trajectory adjustment, constant sunlight, and the ability to move loose structures.

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- nprev   2006XG1   Dec 26 2006, 10:17 PM
- - volcanopele   hmm, I tried simulating this in Celestia, but even...   Dec 26 2006, 11:33 PM
|- - dilo   NeoDys gives only a close approach for another dat...   Dec 26 2006, 11:58 PM
- - nprev   Yeah, I'm sure that will be the case. I notice...   Dec 27 2006, 01:54 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 27 2006, 01:54 AM) 190...   Dec 27 2006, 08:59 AM
||- - RJG   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Dec 27 2006, 08:59 AM) ...   Dec 27 2006, 06:50 PM
||- - tuvas   QUOTE (RJG @ Dec 27 2006, 11:50 AM) Can s...   Dec 27 2006, 06:57 PM
||- - RJG   Thanks Tuvas -sounds like lots of good reasons. Th...   Dec 27 2006, 07:09 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 27 2006, 02:54 AM) And...   Dec 27 2006, 06:23 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (tty @ Dec 27 2006, 10:23 AM) I agr...   Dec 27 2006, 07:22 PM
|- - JRehling   I wonder if a good long-term defense would be to t...   Dec 27 2006, 08:18 PM
|- - nprev   Interesting idea, JR, though I think trying for lu...   Dec 27 2006, 08:31 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 27 2006, 09:18 PM) ...   Dec 27 2006, 09:22 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 27 2006, 09:22 PM) A...   Dec 27 2006, 09:32 PM
- - tuvas   There is a very good reason why both ideas (Crashi...   Dec 27 2006, 09:10 PM
- - tty   You definitely do NOT want to use any violent tech...   Dec 28 2006, 12:37 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (tty @ Dec 28 2006, 01:37 AM) That,...   Dec 28 2006, 12:57 AM
|- - tty   QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 28 2006, 01:57 AM) B...   Dec 28 2006, 02:02 PM
|- - tuvas   QUOTE (tty @ Dec 28 2006, 07:02 AM) It is...   Dec 28 2006, 11:12 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (tuvas @ Dec 28 2006, 03:12 PM) As ...   Dec 28 2006, 11:28 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (tuvas @ Dec 29 2006, 12:12 AM) It ...   Dec 29 2006, 11:53 AM
|- - tuvas   QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 29 2006, 04:53 AM) W...   Dec 29 2006, 02:00 PM
|- - ugordan   If you're referring to the Mach stem where the...   Dec 29 2006, 02:59 PM
- - nprev   Actually, I meant putting threatening bodies in ac...   Dec 28 2006, 04:14 AM
|- - dilo   Agree with you, nprev. Also considering that, in o...   Dec 28 2006, 06:26 AM
- - nprev   Thanks, Dilo. I think it's prudent to save the...   Dec 28 2006, 09:35 AM
- - nprev   Personally, I think it'll be a long, long time...   Dec 28 2006, 11:05 PM
- - Nyx   This is my first post, so welcome everybody!...   Jan 1 2007, 11:59 PM
- - nprev   I think the jury's still out, but there's ...   Jan 2 2007, 12:57 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 08:00 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.