My Assistant
2006XG1, another Torino 1 NEO (for now) |
Dec 26 2006, 10:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8791 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Here's a Christmas present for us all...a 0.7 km NEO may make a 4200 km altitude Earth flyby on Halloween, 2041: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2006xg1.html
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 27 2006, 01:54 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8791 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Yeah, I'm sure that will be the case. I noticed that the NASA NEO site already had 76 observations logged between 11-22 Dec; it must be very favorably placed, so we should see it drop off the radar screen after the holidays.
Good thing, too. 1900 megatons of impact energy could be a bit unpleasant. With that in mind, does anybody think that we should get serious about devising a way to deflect these things, if it's ever needed? I like the idea of "docking" a DS1-style propulsion system to a threatening rock & steering it clear...or, ideally, steering it slowly into an exploitable orbit for future mining! And on a somewhat related topic, is there anything at all we could do about an imminent long-period comet impact? I can't think of a single countermeasure. (Okay, I confess...I rented the classic When Worlds Collide two days ago, and it's been bugging me ever since... -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2006, 08:59 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
1900 megatons of impact energy could be a bit unpleasant. With that in mind, does anybody think that we should get serious about devising a way to deflect these things, if it's ever needed? I like the idea of "docking" a DS1-style propulsion system to a threatening rock & steering it clear...or, ideally, steering it slowly into an exploitable orbit for future mining! And on a somewhat related topic, is there anything at all we could do about an imminent long-period comet impact? I can't think of a single countermeasure. (Okay, I confess...I rented the classic When Worlds Collide two days ago, and it's been bugging me ever since... The most attractive proposal I've seen is for a 'gravitational tractor' where a vehicle with an ion-engine is held aloft 'above' the target rock/dustpile/snowdrift and gradually applies a small force (equivalent to it's local weight, so merely ounces in the case of a test vehicle) for years at a time. In the case of a more urgent removal mission, you could send more spacecraft rather than being stuck with a Saturn V/Icarus scenario. By remaining perched above the sweet spot you could have the best possible trajectory adjustment, constant sunlight, and the ability to move loose structures. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
nprev 2006XG1 Dec 26 2006, 10:17 PM
volcanopele hmm, I tried simulating this in Celestia, but even... Dec 26 2006, 11:33 PM
dilo NeoDys gives only a close approach for another dat... Dec 26 2006, 11:58 PM

RJG QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Dec 27 2006, 08:59 AM) ... Dec 27 2006, 06:50 PM

tuvas QUOTE (RJG @ Dec 27 2006, 11:50 AM) Can s... Dec 27 2006, 06:57 PM

RJG Thanks Tuvas -sounds like lots of good reasons. Th... Dec 27 2006, 07:09 PM
tty QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 27 2006, 02:54 AM) And... Dec 27 2006, 06:23 PM
nprev QUOTE (tty @ Dec 27 2006, 10:23 AM) I agr... Dec 27 2006, 07:22 PM
JRehling I wonder if a good long-term defense would be to t... Dec 27 2006, 08:18 PM
nprev Interesting idea, JR, though I think trying for lu... Dec 27 2006, 08:31 PM
ugordan QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 27 2006, 09:18 PM) ... Dec 27 2006, 09:22 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 27 2006, 09:22 PM) A... Dec 27 2006, 09:32 PM
tuvas There is a very good reason why both ideas (Crashi... Dec 27 2006, 09:10 PM
tty You definitely do NOT want to use any violent tech... Dec 28 2006, 12:37 AM
ugordan QUOTE (tty @ Dec 28 2006, 01:37 AM) That,... Dec 28 2006, 12:57 AM
tty QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 28 2006, 01:57 AM) B... Dec 28 2006, 02:02 PM
tuvas QUOTE (tty @ Dec 28 2006, 07:02 AM) It is... Dec 28 2006, 11:12 PM
nprev QUOTE (tuvas @ Dec 28 2006, 03:12 PM) As ... Dec 28 2006, 11:28 PM
ugordan QUOTE (tuvas @ Dec 29 2006, 12:12 AM) It ... Dec 29 2006, 11:53 AM
tuvas QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 29 2006, 04:53 AM) W... Dec 29 2006, 02:00 PM
ugordan If you're referring to the Mach stem where the... Dec 29 2006, 02:59 PM
nprev Actually, I meant putting threatening bodies in ac... Dec 28 2006, 04:14 AM
dilo Agree with you, nprev. Also considering that, in o... Dec 28 2006, 06:26 AM
nprev Thanks, Dilo. I think it's prudent to save the... Dec 28 2006, 09:35 AM
nprev Personally, I think it'll be a long, long time... Dec 28 2006, 11:05 PM
Nyx This is my first post, so welcome everybody!... Jan 1 2007, 11:59 PM
nprev I think the jury's still out, but there's ... Jan 2 2007, 12:57 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 08:00 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|