My Assistant
Two interesting stories on Space.com |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 28 2006, 06:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
A couple of interesting MER-related stories (1, 2) on Space.com today, although it seems to me that many of the details in the first story we learned from Doug's November 6, 2006, interview with Squyres.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 15 2007, 02:49 PM
Post
#2
|
||
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 240 Joined: 18-July 06 Member No.: 981 |
What I mean is that software advances require a good dose of inspiration and yes, that often visits a struggling programmer at 4AM while bleary eyed, head-in-hands and stoked on caffeine. I'm not saying breakthroughs in software should not then be battle tested before flying though.
Taking a dispassionate look at the technical accomplishments of the MER engineers and scientists, you can't help but be awe-struck. For three years, and through severe thermal cycling each sol, without a single pit stop, both rovers have: Maintained outstanding mobility (even allowing for Spirit's gimpy foot) Flawlessly managed their power and communications subsystems Maintained a virtually complete, functioning set of instruments Made over a hundred thousand scientific observations Never forgotten to "phone home" However optimistic the mission managers secretly were about these platforms, this must go way beyond their wildest expectations. All to the good. But largely the result of outstanding hardware design and testing. The software is utilitarian and does what it has to (and perhaps runs at the limit of the RAD6000, whose descendants are found in: |
|
|
|
||
Feb 15 2007, 03:19 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The software is utilitarian and does what it has to You're clearly not going to moved on the issue - but I strongly object to that statement. If it did what it HAD to - then it would have none of the recent upgrades. If it did what it HAD to - it would have uninstalled itself and shut the vehicles down at sunrise on Sol 91 Doug |
|
|
|
AlexBlackwell Two interesting stories on Space.com Dec 28 2006, 06:30 PM
Myran Oh yes I read them too, so who might this person b... Dec 28 2006, 06:45 PM
Shaka QUOTE (Myran @ Dec 28 2006, 08:45 AM) Oh ... Dec 28 2006, 07:01 PM
Stu Didn't know that story was going up until I re... Dec 28 2006, 07:24 PM
tuvas That's cool man, the best I did on space.com w... Dec 28 2006, 07:43 PM
Tesheiner Very nice words (as usual ), Stu!
Congratula... Dec 28 2006, 08:21 PM
Steve QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Dec 28 2006, 01:30... Dec 28 2006, 08:50 PM
Stu Wow... Just gone online after getting up and found... Dec 29 2006, 07:16 AM
MarsIsImportant Stu, a lot of people may simply follow the story i... Dec 29 2006, 08:05 AM
Stu QUOTE (MarsIsImportant @ Dec 29 2006, 08... Dec 29 2006, 08:12 AM
CosmicRocker I've been partially out of touch recently, wit... Jan 2 2007, 06:43 AM
ustrax Hey!
I just read the article now...
That... Jan 4 2007, 11:26 AM
Stu Thanks ustrax!
Couple of UMSFers name-chec... Jan 4 2007, 05:25 PM
CosmicRocker I just want to sneak in and apologize for mixing u... Jan 5 2007, 06:01 AM
ustrax One more from Space.com Feb 14 2007, 12:53 PM
MarkL Great articles, thanks; but aren't these the t... Feb 14 2007, 01:31 PM
paxdan "better is the enemy of good enough" Feb 14 2007, 01:48 PM
djellison QUOTE (MarkL @ Feb 14 2007, 01:31 PM) I g... Feb 14 2007, 02:03 PM
MahFL Walk 10 Km in a Space Suit ? I don't think so,... Feb 14 2007, 02:22 PM
MahFL I was in Kendal last summer, I introduced my Ameri... Feb 14 2007, 02:33 PM
mhoward Just repeating some things I've learned on thi... Feb 14 2007, 02:50 PM
MarkL No doubt lack of time is a giant issue, as is avai... Feb 14 2007, 04:38 PM
helvick QUOTE It's just a software problem -- nothing ... Feb 14 2007, 05:16 PM
MarkL You're right. The software has worked very ve... Feb 15 2007, 06:45 PM
Jim from NSF.com QUOTE (MarkL @ Feb 15 2007, 02:45 PM) You... Jun 7 2007, 04:57 PM
nprev QUOTE (Jim from NSF.com @ Jun 7 2007, 09... Jun 8 2007, 03:45 AM
gpurcell Only in retrospect can we know that some of these ... Feb 21 2007, 10:37 PM
ustrax Very interesting article by Steve Squyres. Mar 29 2007, 11:59 AM
Tesheiner When Will NASA's Mars Rovers Fade? Not Tonight... Jun 7 2007, 04:09 PM
Stu Thanks
I know a lot of people here on UMSF fee... Jun 7 2007, 04:34 PM
Gray Great article, Stu.
You have a wonderful way wi... Jun 7 2007, 04:58 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (Gray @ Jun 7 2007, 06:58 AM) ... Jun 7 2007, 05:25 PM
Stu Thanks Gray. There should be a couple more pieces ... Jun 7 2007, 05:20 PM
CosmicRocker Very nice, Stu. I just came across the new piece ... Jun 7 2007, 06:17 PM
Pavel Too bad the link to UMSF is incorrect and leads to... Jun 7 2007, 08:02 PM
Stu QUOTE (Pavel @ Jun 7 2007, 09:02 PM) Too ... Jun 7 2007, 09:01 PM
Phillip Thanks for the article Stu and well done indeed. ... Jun 8 2007, 12:55 AM
helvick Stu,
Seems like there are Browcoats everywhere th... Jun 8 2007, 06:28 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:54 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|