Blue Origins, update |
Blue Origins, update |
Jan 4 2007, 02:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 162 Joined: 16-March 05 From: Oakville, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 201 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 8 2007, 01:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13250 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
With such high gravity to fight against, and a nice thick atmosphere that's screaming out for chutes, parafoils etc.... landing with rockets on Earth just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Doug |
|
|
|
Jan 8 2007, 02:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 565 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
[L]anding with rockets on Earth just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I agree. Using one of the fresh envelope-backs I got for Christmas, I see that retro-rocket-landing an Apollo CM from the drogue release altitude and speed, for example, would require something like a beefed-up AJ10-137 engine (massing around 4000kg), 31 seconds' thrust (1450 kg of fuel and oxidiser), all crammed into a 5800 kg mass capsule (!!). Naturally the engine would have to poke through the heat shield, which additionally complicates matters. Comparing that to the (original) 245kg parachutes-and-drogues-and-deployment package, it's an absolute no-brainer. <long pause> ...though, in its favour <whispering> it would look rather Heinleinian. Andy |
|
|
|
Jan 8 2007, 04:35 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1043 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Comparing that to the (original) 245kg parachutes-and-drogues-and-deployment package, it's an absolute no-brainer. If you're never going to use the vehicle again, absolutely. The arguments for VTVL all revolve around reusability and rapid turnaround. See, for example, http://www.thespacereview.com/article/412/1 I'm agnostic on the topic; like most engineering, there is no clear best solution. It's very dependent on the mission profile and on the logistical/economic assumptions. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
Jan 8 2007, 07:48 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2562 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
If you're never going to use the vehicle again, absolutely. I'm agnostic on the topic; like most engineering, there is no clear best solution. It's very dependent on the mission profile and on the logistical/economic assumptions. I agree but I also wonder if a Soyouz-like last seconds hard brake retro-rocket solution could be used. There's no need here to have a "smooth" hard-brake since there's nobody inside. Is they can get the retro rocket working in the good force vector and then inflate air bags so the stage doen't hit too hard, I bet it'll not be too much of an extra weight as compared to reusability. And it'll be an elegant solution. -------------------- |
|
|
|
jabe Blue Origins Jan 4 2007, 02:47 AM
helvick I was always a fan of the DC-X concept so this rea... Jan 4 2007, 09:42 AM
djellison Well - consider the Atlas-Mercury flights. That w... Jan 4 2007, 10:04 AM
tty The first stage of Titan I had genuine SSTO capabi... Jan 4 2007, 11:16 AM
edstrick With adequate heat shielding, a vehicle derived fr... Jan 4 2007, 12:53 PM
Bob Shaw Back in the 1960s there were a number of paper stu... Jan 4 2007, 08:27 PM
climber The goal here is "only" to get to 100 km... Jan 4 2007, 08:19 PM
nprev As a side note, this test is getting a lot of medi... Jan 5 2007, 01:36 AM
edstrick X33 was a good idea to follow up the DC-X with, bu... Jan 5 2007, 09:50 AM
nprev With respect to Blue Origin, a friend of mine ... Jan 6 2007, 12:52 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 6 2007, 12:52 AM) un-n... Jan 6 2007, 01:32 AM
nprev Wellll....I'm not much of an orbitsmith yet, B... Jan 6 2007, 02:58 AM
remcook if you do a Hohmann-style rendezvous, you mean tha... Jan 6 2007, 11:55 AM
Bob Shaw Absolutely!
Going straight up with a VTVL fir... Jan 6 2007, 01:50 PM
nprev Yeah (sigh), that's probably quite true; a use... Jan 7 2007, 03:47 AM
Jim from NSF.com QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 6 2007, 10:47 PM) Yeah... Jan 9 2007, 06:35 PM
edstrick I have wondered if a 2 stage double DC-X type migh... Jan 7 2007, 09:51 AM
Bob Shaw I think the word you're looking for is 'Ki... Jan 7 2007, 01:48 PM
edstrick The Kstler vehicles are being soft <parachute a... Jan 8 2007, 12:22 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (climber @ Jan 8 2007, 07:48 PM) I ... Jan 8 2007, 10:22 PM
mchan QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 8 2007, 02:22 PM) S... Jan 9 2007, 03:53 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 9 2007, 03:53 AM) Ahh,... Jan 9 2007, 08:37 AM
nprev Well, it actually was just a back-of-the envelope ... Jan 11 2007, 02:07 AM
edstrick Landing an Apollo like capsule on rockets is -- of... Jan 11 2007, 12:21 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 01:43 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|