My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
A British lunar mission? |
Jan 17 2007, 09:33 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Closest Europe's gotten to a penetrator was Beagle 2.
>ducks and hides!< |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 10:29 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 29-July 05 From: Amsterdam, NL Member No.: 448 |
Well, MoonLITE is back in the news on BBC. I must say that I always grin when I hear about a UK-sponsored space project. The UK has more than enough industry, science, and inginuity but space science has never been a major focus. Their last one was very exciting proposal--a real budget "ride along" trying to take some wind out of the MER's sails. It just needed a few more pounds in the project, I guess.
Anyway, back to MoonLITE. This time around, NASA is apparently "very likely to support plans to send a British probe to the Moon" with a hopeful launch date in 2012. NASA should ask the UK space community to carry out a detailed feasibility study by the end of the summer. The proposal still uses multiple (4) penetrators with a simple relay orbiter. "These would quite literally enable scientists to scratch below the lunar surface. These would hit the Moon at extremely high speeds, about 300m/s (1080km/h) and penetrate to a depth of two metres. Once embedded in the surface, instruments in the penetrators would listen out for 'Moonquakes'." Another story can be found here as well as a more official MoonLITE/Moonraker proposal. The MOONlite mission looks remarkably similar to JAXA's Lunar-A (lunar penetrators/seismology) - I was wondering if it would be a UK/JAXA collaboration, or if they intended to use Lunar-A's lunar penetrators(if Lunar-A is cancelled)? I think the MoonLITE proposal builds off a lot of the Lunar-A ideas, but it will not be a direct collaboration. The only possible partners with MoonLITE at the moment are NASA and the Indian Space Agency, but no one is officially on board. I did find something about the possible Russian Luna-Glob mission reusing two of the Lunar-A penetrators in addition to ten of their own. We'll see where all of this this goes. |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 11:47 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
And meanwhile :
http://chrislintott.net/2007/12/11/stfcs-plans/ http://www.scitech.ac.uk/About/Strat/Counc...FC_DelPlan.aspx Seems odd to be proposing a lunar mission when big cuts are underway. Doug |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2007, 02:39 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10255 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Big cuts for pure science, big bucks - I mean pounds - for engineering?
Phi -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2007, 08:35 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
In this field - they're one and the same - STFC is where the funding for such a thing would come from ( Science and Technology Funding Council - although I remember it as Swindon Town Football Club, as the offices are in Swindon) I would have thought. There might be other pathways from other sources, but I can't see them being sufficiently large for a project like this.
Doug |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2007, 10:36 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 18-November 07 Member No.: 3964 |
NASA is apparently "very likely to support plans to send a British probe to the Moon" with a hopeful launch date in 2012. I would like to see it launched in 2011 on the same EELV as GRAIL. The total launch mass of MoonLITE is about 846 kg. Compare it with 834 kg total wet mass of LCROSS Sheperd Spacecraft. |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 08:50 PM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 29-November 06 From: SESE/ASU Member No.: 1437 |
I would like to see it launched in 2011 on the same EELV as GRAIL. The total launch mass of MoonLITE is about 846 kg. Compare it with 834 kg total wet mass of LCROSS Sheperd Spacecraft. Actually, that's not that bad of an idea, as it make it politically harder to kill either mission (though there's little chance GRAIL will be canceled). Problem is, you have to get funded first before worrying about getting canceled... Also, considering the nightmares the Japanese had with their lunar penetrators, I wonder just how successful MoonLite would be... Simon |
|
|
|
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Apr 9 2008, 05:09 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Guests |
Nice article in the April 2008 issue of TheSkyAtNight magazine "Britain's Moon Shot "pages 36 - 41
with comments by Sir Martin Sweeting & Prof Alan Smith |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 05:59 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&...vjbWScEFKePjzMw
Here's one for the Brits: Me an me Mam an me Dad an me Gran are off to clock the moon Me an me Mam an me Dad an me Gran and a rocket of MoonLITE Hit the moon (stomp stomp) Hit the moon (stomp stomp) Hit the moon, hit the moon DAA DAA |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 06:59 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8789 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Okay, I'm jealous. Not only do you guys get to hit the Moon, but you got a pub song for it! Can't get anybody to sing anything except bad karaoke in the US, dammit...
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 07:49 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The music goes like this :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T1pXsJp_go And I think...I THINK... Colin Pillinger is in the video somewhere. I might be wrong on that one. Doug |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 07:58 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Then there's that immortal line
Can I introduce you please to a lump of cheddar cheese ('cept its really Wensleydale) |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 08:00 PM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
1998?!?!?!??!?!??! O.... M..... G.....!!!! Is it really ten years since I was on my feet singing "Vindaloo" in the pub in front of a huge TV screen, wrapped up in a St George flag and crunching my way through my tenth packet of Scampi Fries?!?!?!
Happy days.... (I know, I know, you're seeing me in a whole new light now, eh? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 09:09 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
-------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 09:29 PM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Arabia Terra Member No.: 12 |
I'm worried for two reasons:
1) Penetrators are high risk landers and Moonlite will only carry four. Hitting a rock= goodbye data return. 2) Luna-Glob will launch first, carry more penetrators (both Japanese and Russian designs) and may well steal Moonlite's thunder |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 03:10 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|