My Assistant
Helicopters on Mars?, (Forget the Mars Airplane) |
Jan 10 2007, 11:38 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
Hello again,
With the Martian airplane concept becoming sort of abandoned these days, I just wonder if a Martian CHOPPER was ever considered. With the capability of MRO I guess we do not need airborn instruments dedicated to imaging there. But: what about chemical measurements and "sniffing" for volatiles? Imagine something that could land at one spot found to be interesting on MRO photos and then take off and go sniffing for methane somewhere else? What do you think? Does it make any sense to you? Regards, Karol P. Poland -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 10 2007, 01:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Very interesting. How do people rate these ideas? Should they be taken seriously? I can't see any obvious reason why not. Using in-situ resources for both baloon-filling gas and power seems very appealing, almost too good to be true - but maybe it's just too good not to try?
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 02:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
Actually, balloons were not only considered. They were built by the French for the Russians but the mission ended up exploring the bottom of Earth's ocean. It it were not so, and if Mars Observer didn't fail, we would have remembered it as the first orbiter to relay data from a balloon dragging a "snake" on the surface:
"Mars Observer was also to support the acquisition of data from the Russian Mars 1994 mission through the use of the joint French-Russian-American Mars BALLOON Relay instrument." http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/Master...og?sc=1992-063A And: "The design and utilization plans for the Mars Balloon guiderope are described with attention given to environmental and mission constraints. The guiderope is intended to enable the balloon to fly close to the Martian surface to sample the surface and near-surface atmosphere. The 'Snake' concept is described for this application which comprises overlapping cones that provide a smooth dragging surface as well as structural flexibility. A 'tail' segment of small diameter is attached to the Snake that stabilizes the guiderope with titanium shells and also serves as half of the required radar dipole antenna. A specific design is set forth for the Snake and Tail elements that provides dust-tolerant effectiveness without lubricant for the extreme conditions of the Martian surface. The resulting guiderope for the Mars 96 Balloon Mission is expected to render the exploratory mission effective." http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992wadc.iafcY....L -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 03:05 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 18-July 05 Member No.: 438 |
... They were built by the French for the Russians but the mission ended up exploring the bottom of Earth's ocean. Just to be pedantic, it's often stated that Mars 96 ended up in the Pacific, but it actually came down in Bolivia or surrounding territories; several people at ESO observed it descend. 10 years may have blurred the details, but as I recall... The confusion over its final resting place is probably caused by the fact that NORAD announced it was tracking the spacecraft after it failed to leave Earth orbit, and, if I recall correctly, the US offered help to Australia if the spacecraft with its plutonium power supplies landed on their territory. They then announced that it had re-entered "safely" over the Pacific. It was later realized that NORAD had been tracking the final stage, and that Mars-96 itself had already detached and had re-entered the Earth atmosphere over the Andes. No-one offered Bolivia help with the clear-up though, and as far as I know, the debris has not been located. It was a huge loss... the most massive interplanetary spacecraft ever launched; even exceeding Cassini's mass. |
|
|
|
karolp Helicopters on Mars? Jan 10 2007, 11:38 AM
djellison I've changed the topic of the thread - you wro... Jan 10 2007, 12:06 PM
Bob Shaw Helicopters on Titan, that's the thing. You us... Jan 10 2007, 12:30 PM
karolp Thank you for correcting me. I also thought the de... Jan 10 2007, 01:08 PM
ngunn Variations on the hot air balloon theme make a lot... Jan 10 2007, 01:13 PM
djellison Oh - I've seen pdf's and ppt's showing... Jan 10 2007, 01:23 PM
Jim from NSF.com QUOTE (ynyralmaen @ Jan 10 2007, 10:05 AM... Jan 10 2007, 04:30 PM
ynyralmaen QUOTE (Jim from NSF.com @ Jan 10 2007, 05... Jan 10 2007, 07:25 PM
remcook The Mars 96 mission was supposed to have a balloon... Jan 10 2007, 02:09 PM
Gray Just yesterday I happened to see a photo of a flyi... Jan 10 2007, 02:54 PM
MarkL QUOTE (Gray @ Jan 10 2007, 02:54 PM) Just... Jan 10 2007, 04:54 PM
MarkL It was a great loss at the time, but putting it in... Jan 10 2007, 04:39 PM
Gray In addition to carbon dioxide, I suspect that devi... Jan 10 2007, 06:15 PM
Tom Ames Compared to fixed-wing and lighter-than-air craft,... Jan 10 2007, 07:26 PM
Paolo A prototype of a Mars autogyro (a sort of helicopt... Jan 10 2007, 07:47 PM
helvick I can't see any reason for doing this rather t... Jan 10 2007, 08:16 PM
ngunn A delayed thank you to doug, karolp and remcook fo... Jan 10 2007, 08:17 PM
Myran Theres not only one but several obstacles thaty I ... Jan 11 2007, 11:52 PM
tty QUOTE (Myran @ Jan 12 2007, 12:52 AM) As ... Jan 12 2007, 07:17 PM
nprev Yet another major disadvantage of UMSF helicopters... Jan 12 2007, 01:38 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 12 2007, 01:38 AM) The... Jan 12 2007, 05:51 PM
edstrick Airplanes fly by the laws of aerodynamics.
Helicop... Jan 12 2007, 11:11 AM
tty QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 12 2007, 12:11 PM) ... Jan 12 2007, 07:20 PM
djellison There's a tape out there by an ex pilot who di... Jan 12 2007, 07:54 PM
nprev ...yep. Back in the day when I worked avionics on ... Jan 13 2007, 05:08 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 13 2007, 05:08 AM) ..... Jan 13 2007, 04:28 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 13 2007, 05:28 PM) ... Jan 13 2007, 05:39 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 13 2007, 05:39 PM) Gyrop... Jan 13 2007, 06:11 PM
edstrick ""Helicopters can't really fly, they... Jan 13 2007, 01:30 PM
nprev Titan would of course be far more rotary-friendly ... Jan 13 2007, 06:41 PM
Thu There's an even more simple design than helos ... Jan 14 2007, 08:39 AM
edstrick The worst case scenario for flying is Triton. Sur... Jan 14 2007, 11:08 AM
jamescanvin Moved posts about Aerobraking at Triton Jan 17 2007, 09:26 PM
Bob Shaw I just came across a photo of Zubrin's Gashopp... Jan 18 2007, 01:34 PM
djellison So did someone else on page 1 of this thread. Jan 18 2007, 03:28 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 18 2007, 03:28 PM)... Jan 18 2007, 04:55 PM
Shaka Looks like somebody forgot to forget the Mars airp... Feb 13 2007, 07:31 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:53 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|