My Assistant
Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true? |
Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 20-September 06 From: Hanoi, Vietnam Member No.: 1164 |
According to this link, China fired a missile to destroy an orbiting weather satellite last week: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/China_Tras...e_Test_999.html
I am curios about what kind of projectile could be used? A "smart" one with on board guidance system or just a dumb one? How close did the "killer satellite" came to the target? Does anybody have an idea? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 22 2007, 04:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Very very close to becoming a political thread here - but the USA recently refused to sign up to an agreement banning such tests.
Doug |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
The US did develop an anti-satellite weapon back in the 1980's and actually shot one down in 1985. I beleive the weapon was actually carried on an F-15 and shot into space (Pagasus style). While the US has not conducted such tests since then (that we know of..) it is beleived they still have the capability.
As for the Chinese anti-sat weapon being 'smart' or 'dumb' it is hard to say. You would not have to do a 'bullet hits a bullet' type of kill vehicle to accomplish this. Rather, a 'dumb' weapon could be used to spray some material, over a large area, in the path of the intended satellite, like sand or ball bearings. The relative speed would between the objects would be all thats needed. |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 06:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
like sand or ball bearings. The relative speed would between the objects would be all thats needed. That's what I was imagining this to have been. Launch - on a high sub-orb trajectory, and disperse a cloud of lead shot etc - through the satellite goes - 7.5k/sec impacts - the remaining shot just re-enters harmlessly but the sat is blown to pieces. Doug |
|
|
|
Thu Anti-satellite weapon test? Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
climber QUOTE (Thu @ Jan 19 2007, 03:39 PM) Accor... Jan 19 2007, 03:06 PM
Lorne Ipsum Nobody really knows the details, but most reports ... Jan 19 2007, 06:51 PM
nprev Anybody know what the inclination of the target sa... Jan 20 2007, 01:59 AM
OWW QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 20 2007, 02:59 AM) I g... Jan 20 2007, 12:12 PM
Thu Thank you all for your information. Still no offic... Jan 22 2007, 04:42 PM
tty Actually a satellite in LEO is not a particularly ... Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM) It wo... Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
helvick So with a bit of luck they might now consider that... Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM
climber QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 09:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM

Bob Shaw QUOTE (climber @ Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM) M... Jan 23 2007, 11:42 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 11:31 AM
djellison Just thinking in terms of 'impact window' ... Jan 22 2007, 09:01 PM
helvick Your calculations are only valid for an orthogonal... Jan 22 2007, 09:24 PM
tty QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2007, 10:01 PM)... Jan 23 2007, 07:32 AM
djellison You don't need fusing - this was a kinetic imp... Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM)... Jan 23 2007, 11:11 AM
mchan There was an article quoting unamed sources that t... Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM) The... Jan 24 2007, 12:11 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 01:11 PM) ... Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM) The n... Jan 24 2007, 09:14 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 10:14 PM) ... Jan 25 2007, 07:07 AM
climber Interesting article on this topic on Aviation Week... Jan 24 2007, 03:56 PM
Thu Finally, we have an official announcement from Chi... Jan 25 2007, 01:07 AM
CosmicRocker I rarely stray into this section of the Forum, and... Jan 25 2007, 06:13 AM
nprev Just to put a bit of (hopefully) UMSF-related spin... Jan 26 2007, 02:35 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:50 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|