Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true? |
Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true? |
Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 20-September 06 From: Hanoi, Vietnam Member No.: 1164 |
According to this link, China fired a missile to destroy an orbiting weather satellite last week: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/China_Tras...e_Test_999.html
I am curios about what kind of projectile could be used? A "smart" one with on board guidance system or just a dumb one? How close did the "killer satellite" came to the target? Does anybody have an idea? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 592 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
There was an article quoting unamed sources that there were three previous unsuccessful attempts.
Regarding detecting / tracking the ASAT engine plume, the ASAT would only need course correction maneuvers in the end game. These burns are relatively low energy. Early warning sats are required to detect rocket plumes during boost phase which are much larger. Whether their sensors are sensitive enough to detect small ASAT course correction burns is unknown outside the classified realm, but my guess is not likely. Regarding staring sensors, the operational US early warning sats in geosynchronous orbit still use a scanning sensor. There have been tests of staring senors in add-on payloads to other military sats in high elliptical orbits. I don't recall reading that these are in operational use. |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2007, 12:11 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
There was an article quoting unamed sources that there were three previous unsuccessful attempts. Regarding detecting / tracking the ASAT engine plume, the ASAT would only need course correction maneuvers in the end game. These burns are relatively low energy. I'm not surprised to hear that, three sounds sorta sensible for a demo programme. As for the rocket plume, I'll grant that control inputs will lessen as 'rendezvous' (haha) approaches, but you still need a reasonable belt to get up there in the first place, and that's the signature which would be detected. I'd also wager that the test took place over some appropriate part of China and that the USAF had a good idea of which might be a target satellite well in advance, thus making detection almost a numbers game. And that numbers game would serve to obfuscate the exact capabilities of US space intelligence assets, too... ...staring IR or not! Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Thu Anti-satellite weapon test? Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
climber QUOTE (Thu @ Jan 19 2007, 03:39 PM) Accor... Jan 19 2007, 03:06 PM
Lorne Ipsum Nobody really knows the details, but most reports ... Jan 19 2007, 06:51 PM
nprev Anybody know what the inclination of the target sa... Jan 20 2007, 01:59 AM
OWW QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 20 2007, 02:59 AM) I g... Jan 20 2007, 12:12 PM
Thu Thank you all for your information. Still no offic... Jan 22 2007, 04:42 PM
djellison Very very close to becoming a political thread her... Jan 22 2007, 04:53 PM
Chmee The US did develop an anti-satellite weapon back i... Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM
djellison QUOTE (Chmee @ Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM) lik... Jan 22 2007, 06:29 PM
tty Actually a satellite in LEO is not a particularly ... Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM) It wo... Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
helvick So with a bit of luck they might now consider that... Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM
climber QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 09:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM

Bob Shaw QUOTE (climber @ Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM) M... Jan 23 2007, 11:42 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 11:31 AM
djellison Just thinking in terms of 'impact window' ... Jan 22 2007, 09:01 PM
helvick Your calculations are only valid for an orthogonal... Jan 22 2007, 09:24 PM
tty QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2007, 10:01 PM)... Jan 23 2007, 07:32 AM
djellison You don't need fusing - this was a kinetic imp... Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM)... Jan 23 2007, 11:11 AM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 01:11 PM) ... Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM) The n... Jan 24 2007, 09:14 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 10:14 PM) ... Jan 25 2007, 07:07 AM
climber Interesting article on this topic on Aviation Week... Jan 24 2007, 03:56 PM
Thu Finally, we have an official announcement from Chi... Jan 25 2007, 01:07 AM
CosmicRocker I rarely stray into this section of the Forum, and... Jan 25 2007, 06:13 AM
nprev Just to put a bit of (hopefully) UMSF-related spin... Jan 26 2007, 02:35 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 07:00 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|