Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true? |
Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true? |
Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 20-September 06 From: Hanoi, Vietnam Member No.: 1164 |
According to this link, China fired a missile to destroy an orbiting weather satellite last week: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/China_Tras...e_Test_999.html
I am curios about what kind of projectile could be used? A "smart" one with on board guidance system or just a dumb one? How close did the "killer satellite" came to the target? Does anybody have an idea? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 22 2007, 09:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13246 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Just thinking in terms of 'impact window' - i.e. the time taken for the target to cover it's own size in terms of distance - the variable that identifies how accurate something has to be to hit something rushing past - not totally analogous ( you could drive 'down' the velocity vector for instance ) - but it gives you a sense of the scale of the problem.
Car - 4.3 metres - 26 m/sec - window is 0.165 seconds. Jumbo Jet - 57 metres - 223 m/sec - window is 0.255 seconds ( this is why a jumbo 'looks' so slow in the sky - it covers it's own length slower than a small car rushing past). F22 - .030 seconds. Satellite - 3 metre sized bus - 7500 m/sec - window is 0.0004 seconds i.e. stood watching the thing fly past - you've got to be 412 times more accurate hitting a spacecraft than a car doing 60 mph. 637 times more accurate than hitting a flying jumbo - and 75 times more accurate than hitting an F22 raptor. It's a big ask - I don't know how hard it actually is - but this isn't "let's modify a sidewinder' type thing. Doug |
|
|
|
Thu Anti-satellite weapon test? Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
climber QUOTE (Thu @ Jan 19 2007, 03:39 PM) Accor... Jan 19 2007, 03:06 PM
Lorne Ipsum Nobody really knows the details, but most reports ... Jan 19 2007, 06:51 PM
nprev Anybody know what the inclination of the target sa... Jan 20 2007, 01:59 AM
OWW QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 20 2007, 02:59 AM) I g... Jan 20 2007, 12:12 PM
Thu Thank you all for your information. Still no offic... Jan 22 2007, 04:42 PM
djellison Very very close to becoming a political thread her... Jan 22 2007, 04:53 PM
Chmee The US did develop an anti-satellite weapon back i... Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM
djellison QUOTE (Chmee @ Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM) lik... Jan 22 2007, 06:29 PM
tty Actually a satellite in LEO is not a particularly ... Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM) It wo... Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
helvick So with a bit of luck they might now consider that... Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM
climber QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 09:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM

Bob Shaw QUOTE (climber @ Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM) M... Jan 23 2007, 11:42 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM) (... Jan 23 2007, 11:31 AM
helvick Your calculations are only valid for an orthogonal... Jan 22 2007, 09:24 PM
tty QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2007, 10:01 PM)... Jan 23 2007, 07:32 AM
djellison You don't need fusing - this was a kinetic imp... Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM)... Jan 23 2007, 11:11 AM
mchan There was an article quoting unamed sources that t... Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM) The... Jan 24 2007, 12:11 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 01:11 PM) ... Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM) The n... Jan 24 2007, 09:14 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 10:14 PM) ... Jan 25 2007, 07:07 AM
climber Interesting article on this topic on Aviation Week... Jan 24 2007, 03:56 PM
Thu Finally, we have an official announcement from Chi... Jan 25 2007, 01:07 AM
CosmicRocker I rarely stray into this section of the Forum, and... Jan 25 2007, 06:13 AM
nprev Just to put a bit of (hopefully) UMSF-related spin... Jan 26 2007, 02:35 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 12:17 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|