IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2007-09-10 Iapetus (rev 49): Pre-flyby discussion, Closest approach of this odd moon
TritonAntares
post Jan 20 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #201


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
let me open this thread on the closest Iapetus flyby on September 10th later this year.
Hopefully we'll get some more clues to solve the mysteries of this odd moon, like the origin of the equatorial ridge and the brightness differance...

First, some new infos given by Tilmann Denk from FU Berlin:
CASSINI will pass Iapetus in roughly 1600 km.
An UVIS star occultation of sigma Sagitarii will now occur about 1 hour before closest approach - instead of during it.
This will now allow an additional window for high resolved pics of the highest known parts of the equatorial ridge at 160°
(phase between ~140° and ~30°) now, apparently a decisive approvement of this encounter.
Detailed planing can be started soon... smile.gif



Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
tasp
post Sep 11 2007, 05:45 PM
Post #202


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Regarding the dimensions and 'spin down' of Iapetus, I have noted (although I don't have the precise figures handy) that Iapetus deviates from the expected triaxial ellipsoid shape somewhat.

Could we be seeing the effects of one more factor in generating the observed shape of Iapetus ?? As it spun down and cooled and locked in it's polar flattened shape, would proximity of Iapetus to a secondary orbiting body explain the discrepency ??

If we have a 'squashed' Iapetus, we rightly infer freezing then spin down preserving it's primordial form. If in this era we note a 'deformity' in the form of Iapetus, perhaps we are seeing the signature of a 'submoon' frozen in it's form too.

Not sure how accurately the distortion can be characterized, but with a few assumptions regarding distance to the secondary perhaps we could generate a range of expected masses for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 12:31 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.